calamaridog
Expedition Leader
Semi auto .22 = more fun plinking. Any brand should be fine.
OK, I guess I don't quite get the Ruger antipathy...as has been previously mentioned, the Ruger 10/22 is the most common .22 rifle out there on the market, parts and accessories are cheap and easy to find. If you need a magazine or a barrel you can get one almost anywhere.
I understand wanting something "unique" but "unique" can be a total PITA when you need to replace a broken part. Ask me how I know that.![]()
Otherwise, there are some nice rifles from Marlin out there, too. My first .22 was a Marlin model 60 and I've owned a couple of others since then. For reasons I don't fully understand, semi-auto .22's are considerably cheaper than bolt or lever action .22s (probably the semi's are easier to mass produce.)
I would stay away from the .17 unless you are a varmint hunter or like the throw money away. You can still get .22 for about 2 1/2 cents a round while .17 is almost as expensive as centerfire rifle ammo. Since you're looking for a "plinker" and not a target rifle, .22 should be fine and, again, you can buy .22 ammo anyplace in the US that sells ammo.
Mosin-Nagant: I'd stay away. Mosin Nagants fire a powerful cartridge and kick like a mule, especially in the carbine (short rifle) variants. Unless you're planning on fighting invading Nazis (which the Mosin-Nagant was designed for) you will have too much gun. Ammo can be found that is relatively inexpensive if you don't mind non-reloadable steel-cased Russian or Eastern Bloc ammo but it will still be more than 10x as expensive as the .22. Plus you can shoot a .22 all day but if you shoot more than about 10 rounds from that Mosin-Nagant, you will be black and blue.
On an unrelated note, I am picking up my Marlin in 9 days. I tried to like the Ruger a number of times and I just hated how wide it was. :victory: