Be cautious ordering generic blue wrap LFP cells

shade

Well-known member
Since we're discussing commissioning new LFP batteries, what parameters are considered best practices?
 

john61ct

Adventurer
Pretty well all spelled out above.

Parse it all, post a summary, look for contradictions or Qs need clarifying.
 

luthj

Engineer In Residence
Since we're discussing commissioning new LFP batteries, what parameters are considered best practices?

I would hope a new pre-made pack would not need significant commissioning work. Though there will be an initial charge.

While some folks like to use a balance charger to do the commissioning charge in the final series config. My thoughts are to use the parallel method with a calibrated power supply. Basically get the batteries near 90% with a bulk charge, the use the 20A bench power supply to push the parallel cells up to the 100% full mark. No need to push past 3.6V. Sitting at this voltage for extended periods (weeks), will cause some chemical aging. But for the few hours it takes to top balance it is insignificant.
 

john61ct

Adventurer
If you mean a sealed up drop-in, often no further balancing is even possible, no access to individual cell wires or even voltages, just trust and send it back when something goes wrong.

But easy on C-rates the first couple months helps with longevity

and getting a SoH benchmark for 100% capacity at the pack level will help as a diagnostic later.

Yes, a powerful enough lab-style adjustable PSU for 1S voltage charging in parallel is ideal.

Some "hobby" chargers can be adapted to do so.

Just sitting in parallel is very slow as V gets closer and closer, but pushing up to 3.6V or the vendor spec max voltage should be the final step below that.

Yes not healthy to go past that, IMO just holding CV until current drops to zero, is too much, even past 0.03C or so, better to stop before that.

Becomes your definition of "vendor Full", used for benchmarking.

Different from the gentler 100% Full defined for normal usage cycling, resetting BMV.

For that the minimum required for getting BMS to do balancing will often be the main factor, that can take days sometimes.
 

shade

Well-known member
I would hope a new pre-made pack would not need significant commissioning work. Though there will be an initial charge.

While some folks like to use a balance charger to do the commissioning charge in the final series config. My thoughts are to use the parallel method with a calibrated power supply. Basically get the batteries near 90% with a bulk charge, the use the 20A bench power supply to push the parallel cells up to the 100% full mark. No need to push past 3.6V. Sitting at this voltage for extended periods (weeks), will cause some chemical aging. But for the few hours it takes to top balance it is insignificant.
I'd think not, but I figure there must be a way to exercise it a little the first few cycles.

RC has a few thoughts on the matter, of course: https://marinehowto.com/lifepo4-batteries-on-boats/

When I was digging out a piece of phenolic sheet recently, I think I saw a bench power supply that might be worth bringing home.
 

john61ct

Adventurer
Any conflict between Maine Sail's advice and mine, default to him being correct, and please point the discrepancy out for me
 

shade

Well-known member
Any conflict between Maine Sail's advice and mine, default to him being correct, and please point the discrepancy out for me
Will do, but I doubt there's much of a difference.

I scanned that article a few months ago, and almost forgot about how much information he packed into it.
 

john61ct

Adventurer
Every electrickery article there is worth repeated close parsing, taking notes.

As your overall knowledge grows over months and years, return back to it and you always get new insights and integrate it into the whole.
 

hour

Observer
Second charge up is nearing completion. Victron BMV shows that the pack has been recharged (from 151ah consumed to 0). Things did perform differently this time - I woke up to find three of the cells at 3.6v and current on smart hobby charger a miniscule 1a. One cell is at 3.35v.

On the last (first full) charge, two cells were at this low voltage reading while the other two sat at 3.6v and charge current had been reduced to peanuts. So uhh, maybe this last weird cell will be onboard with the program in another few cycles.

Connected active balancer again to rectify this, with smart charger running during still trying to get everyone to 3.6v. This should be fixed in a few hours and then I'll do a partial discharge, charge up (active balancer on whole time) and see if we're getting there..
 

luthj

Engineer In Residence
It sounds like that one cell may have significantly higher resistance. I hope its just first cycle variance.
 

john61ct

Adventurer
For this testing period, only use that active balancer

as necessary to speed up the balancing process

and only at the top part of the charge cycle.

It may well interfere with the top balance, if deployed at lower SoC, only while charging OK?

The hobby charger is stopping charging as designed, while trying to bleed/burn off Ah from the higher cells, then going back to charge them all, then stopping to bleed (loop)

a super inefficient method, only used because cheap to implement. Same as most cheap BMS.

Make sure your connections are all the same, and well torqued.

Swap positions maybe to test.

Diagram the intra bank wiring?
 

john61ct

Adventurer
Maybe just pack-level charge, disable balancing with the hobby charger.

Just use the Deligreen balancer, and watch the cell voltages manually to ensure not going too high.

If balancing still takes a long time, tune the current input lower so it's just enough, the Deligreen can keep up redistributing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,852
Messages
2,921,601
Members
233,030
Latest member
Houie
Top