Martinjmpr
Wiffleball Batter
I always have maps. Even the best GPS doesn't show all the data a map will. There's also something beneficial about being able to see a large area at a glance instead of having to "scroll around."
Like many others here, I learned land nav in the military in the pre-GPS days.
I do a lot of terrain association to find my position, primarily based on the countours of the road and any other obvious landmarks. There's also modified resection which IMO is the best way to find your exact location quickly. Since most of my travel is on roads or tracks that do show up on a map, modified resection is a great way to find my exact location.
Modified resection is pretty easy: You have to be located along a "linear" terrain feature like a road, a set of RR tracks, a river, a boundary line, or some other feature that will show up on a map (Obviously, you have to be confident that you've chosen the correct linear feature or it's all wasted effort.)
Once you've found that, you have to pick a landmark that's also on the map. Take an azimuth to that object. Convert for declination (map should show what the declination is) and then either add or subtract 180 degrees for the back azimuth. Now draw a line from the landmark to the linear feature along the back azimuth and where it interesects with the linear feature is your location. Too easy.
Like many others here, I learned land nav in the military in the pre-GPS days.
I do a lot of terrain association to find my position, primarily based on the countours of the road and any other obvious landmarks. There's also modified resection which IMO is the best way to find your exact location quickly. Since most of my travel is on roads or tracks that do show up on a map, modified resection is a great way to find my exact location.
Modified resection is pretty easy: You have to be located along a "linear" terrain feature like a road, a set of RR tracks, a river, a boundary line, or some other feature that will show up on a map (Obviously, you have to be confident that you've chosen the correct linear feature or it's all wasted effort.)
Once you've found that, you have to pick a landmark that's also on the map. Take an azimuth to that object. Convert for declination (map should show what the declination is) and then either add or subtract 180 degrees for the back azimuth. Now draw a line from the landmark to the linear feature along the back azimuth and where it interesects with the linear feature is your location. Too easy.