stormlover
Adventurer
Current valving profile on my 4x4 E350 with a 4" lift is:
360/80 linear (Front) and 360/240 digressive (rear). This is what was spec'd from Deaver Spring when I upgraded to their spring package.
Has anyone tried 400/100 valving? My rig feels a bit undershocked and has some pogo action. Bilstein's generic recommendion is 360/80 for full size front solid axle 4WD w/ coil spring. Not sure how the spring rate is different with leaf springs but all loaded up I'm 4600lb over the front axle and 5400lb over the rear axle. From googling around the 400/100 profile is very popular with the rover community, heavy sprung and top heavy when geared up for offroading and camping. Just wondering it it's wasted effort for what might be a limited improvement. The shock valving business seems rather secretive.
360/80 linear (Front) and 360/240 digressive (rear). This is what was spec'd from Deaver Spring when I upgraded to their spring package.
Has anyone tried 400/100 valving? My rig feels a bit undershocked and has some pogo action. Bilstein's generic recommendion is 360/80 for full size front solid axle 4WD w/ coil spring. Not sure how the spring rate is different with leaf springs but all loaded up I'm 4600lb over the front axle and 5400lb over the rear axle. From googling around the 400/100 profile is very popular with the rover community, heavy sprung and top heavy when geared up for offroading and camping. Just wondering it it's wasted effort for what might be a limited improvement. The shock valving business seems rather secretive.