I am, but then my truck is a little bit heavier too though..
On TTS (The Truck Stop) there's been a couple of builds that broke the 300hp mark on a dyno...
You talkin' about your 2500?
Yeah, I'm sure you could boost the 6.2 into 300hp if you wanted to... but like I said for any sort of mild trail/expo build that would be completely unnecessary. Let's not forget the fulltime 4WD and the R380...
Don't get me wrong! Seeing a D1 or an RRC with a boosted 300hp NA GM diesel would be sweet... but my goal in a 6.2L truck was A) +50-100% mpg return over gas V8 and B) availability of cheap parts.
If you can show me that adding a turbo pushes MPG past the maximum possibility of a NA 6.2 (25 mpg is the highest documented I've seen, using fancy injection pump builds) without affecting reliability, then I'm all ears. 3+ months of 6.2 forum reads has led me to the conclusion that even the stock-ish turbos (like Gale Banks) don't necessarily improve either beyond horsepower numbers.
And hey, if you need more horses for your particular application, then by all means... plenty of people tow with their Rovers, etc etc. Turbos are definitely a legitimate option and are a 6.2 common upgrade -- they just don't appear to meet my anticipated needs (single built vehicle, medium load, long distance). By built I mean 31 maybe 32" tires, armor, roofrack, bumper(s) and winch.
I want a 900 mile truck on a single load (i.e. with 4 jerrycans) in 100% offroad conditions -- not necessarily 4L balls-to-the-wall -- but 900 miles without ever having to worry about fuel. Are there many instances I'll encounter 900 miles without services? Probably not... but hey, this is our hobby, right? And the whole point of the 6.2 is doing this on the cheap. :sombrero:
The 6.2 is damn close to that off the shelf so I'm excited to see what RedRover and his expertise will come up with... :wings: