CarFax is no joke. Debate it's accuracy all you want until you are trying to sell or trade your vehicle... I work with these issues every day. Bad carfax equals serious hit in value. Every time.
I don't think that anybody is arguing that CarFax doesn't hurt values. It obviously does. The problem is when what is listed on CarFax is wrong and the value is wrongly lowered.
I have a personal example....I bought a used Mazda at 30K miles with 4 year terms. It had service, registration and smog checks done to it on regular intervals. Each time the mileage was reported to CarFax, as expected. Each time the mileage was increased a fairly predictable amount. When the car was paid off, a DMV title change event was reported to the DMV - again as expected - only this time it was reported with the original 30K miles. CarFax flagged it as a possible odometer rollback. Fast forward 2 more years to trade-in time and the dealer used that to make it virtually worthless as a trade. The even admitted it was an obvious artifact of the way CarFax reports but they could not accept such a liability. The dealer wasn't really to blame, the whole CarFax system, and how widely folks lean on it is.
Back on topic..LOL
The local bodyshop gave a preliminary estimate of $3000, with the disclaimer that "something is going on with that corner, but I can't tell until we get it apart". That tells me he expects the estimate go up after disassembly. They said that the insurance makes them quote used parts first - so the fender ($420), headlight ($360) and foglight ($120) are quoted used. The bumper cover is not available reconditioned, so that is quoted new. How is the fender more expensive than an Adaptive HID assembly? Weird.
A new bumper cover is $792 according to the estimate, so maybe adding the bumper beam, paint and labor to the mix means an ARB actually makes more financial sense? Car-Part doesn't seem to list a price on just the beam/structure.