Mickey Bitsko
Adventurer
With the extra gcwr you can add an auxiliary 30+ gal fuel tank on the trailer,
It's a win win.
It's a win win.
In my experience the 3.5 Ecoboost used more gas towing than the Tundra. Those turbos allow the the little 3.5 to really chug the gas and hold speed?.Does range between fuel stops matter? Thats were the Tundra falls flat on its face especially if your dragging a box thats up past the 80% max load rating. Yes it will drag 10,000 lbs but it only does 5-6mpg doing it. So beyond the load numbers look at fuel capacity and mileage performance with a box in that weight range?.
My only interest in a larger camp trailer is pop top low roof road mode like say Taxa Mantis given my heavy tow pack Expedition will do 14-15mpg going anywhere with it. Currently my 4x6 I do 20-21mpg going anywhere with it which is actually better than my Subaru ??.
It can if you are trying to run at 70 with a giant trailer in tow lol. Thats why we call em eco or boost you don’t get both?In my experience the 3.5 Ecoboost used more gas towing than the Tundra. Those turbos allow the the little 3.5 to really chug the gas and hold speed?.
In my experience the 3.5 Ecoboost used more gas towing than the Tundra. Those turbos allow the the little 3.5 to really chug the gas and hold speed?.
With the extra gcwr you can add an auxiliary 30+ gal fuel tank on the trailer,
It's a win win.
Miles_Sisu,
We can run rough numbers and draw some conclusions…
* Remaining Payload / Tongue Weight Allowance: 790lbs
- Tundra Payload: 1450lbs
- 2 Occupants: 360
- Luggage: 50
- Vehicle Mods & Accessories: 150
- Additional Gear Allowance: 100
*Total Trailer Weight: 6650lbs
- XR22 dry weight: 5200
- Tongue weight: 425
- Propane & 80lbs of batteries = 500 tongue
- Fresh Water, 30 gals: 250lbs (~15% transferred to truck = 535 tongue)
- Food & Beer: 30
- Luggage & Furnishings: 150
- Additional Gear & Toy Allowance: 500!
*Total Tongue Weight at 10%: 650lbs
*Remaining Truck Payload: 140lbs
The math indicates that even with the lowest available towing capacity of 8800lbs you can load up that trailer with a lot of cargo and still be below all the maximum rated capacities.
Its my opinion that factory rated capacities represent the maximum prescribed capacities as agreed upon between the engineering, legal & marketing departments. There is an enormous safety margin built into these truck's ratings and as a platform they’re capable of safely and reliably performing well above their published ratings.
For example: just adding springs to an otherwise stock truck in Australia can increase payload by 20-30%, as certified by federally licensed engineers. Further anecdotal evidence supporting my claim are all of the fully built and laden rigs featured here and other websites that are grossly overloaded yet travel great distances with superb track records for reliability and road safety, albiet with suspension & tires upgraded to match the mission.
This is to say that loading a Tundra up to it’s maximum factory rating isn’t “cutting it close” in any practical sense what-so-ever assuming your load distribution, hitch, ride height, trailer brakes and driving habits are all configured appropriately.
What the truck can do, what it should do and what it's rated to do are very much subject to your perspective on math, insurance liability, fuel economy, passing power and "peace of mind". As per Toyota’s R&D the 5.7L Tundra is plenty. But is it future proof for you?
I'm sorry, but the advice for a 3/4 ton truck for a 23', 5300lb trailer, is silly. I suppose, in theory, a 3/4 ton will tow it better than a 1/2 ton -- but using that same logic, you should get a F-450 with dual rear wheels.
seriously. It's nuts. I think a lot of people love to sit around and theorize about stuff, instead of being out there doing it. If they did, there's no way they'd be telling people a 23' trailer needs a 3/4 ton. I used to tow a 23' 4000lb dry travel trailer with my Tacoma, and it was fine. A bit slower going up the hill, but it was dialed in with a properly adjusted weight distribution system, and it certainly wasn't the slowest vehicle on the freeway going up or down big grades.Ohhh... I guess you didn't get the memo: according to this Forum 1/2 ton trucks are nothing more than minivans with a bed and incapable of safely towing over 500 pounds. Anything over 500 pounds requires a 1 ton, long bed, diesel, 4.56 gears, with a 4" lift and 37s.
Also: I tow 7k with my F150 and have zero issues...lol.
Ohhh... I guess you didn't get the memo: according to this Forum 1/2 ton trucks are nothing more than minivans with a bed and incapable of safely towing over 500 pounds. Anything over 500 pounds requires a 1 ton, long bed, diesel, 4.56 gears, with a 4" lift and 37s.
Also: I tow 7k with my F150 and have zero issues...lol.
Certainly the same is true for the much larger Tundra. I tend to trust Toyota's consensus more than the internet's. Although from a value & performance perspective, domestic diesels tend to have a better cost-to-capability ratio when towing is the primary mission.