Cruiser99 said:Hey Charles,
How good do you thing these Guatemala mechanics in planting a manual in my trucK,
Doron.
4Rescue said:Actualy for those of us who row our own, it IS too bad.
I hate Autos, and I'm not likely to ever change my mind. They add an element of wear and a possible massive weak link in drivetrains. They may make crawling smoother, but my 2 feet can do it just as well
Cheers
Dave
4Rescue said:Actualy for those of us who row our own, it IS too bad.
I hate Autos, and I'm not likely to ever change my mind. They add an element of wear and a possible massive weak link in drivetrains. They may make crawling smoother, but my 2 feet can do it just as well
Cheers
Dave
While I enjoy your anti-GM sentiment, and I clearly LOVE Toyotas... Unless Toyota has reinvented the Auto tranny, it still is a major weak link no matter what it's in. I'm glad to hear that your tranny's have held up, but I wonder if slogging through S. America would change some of that longevity. Bands wear at an exponentialy greater rate than syncros. My runner has 250K+ on the Body and tranny... No wear, great engagement love the tranny. Put it this way, there's a direct connection between the motor and the rear wheels with a manual. Can't say the same about an auto. Plus how much extra stress do you think it puts on the breaks not having compression braking? I'll give you a hint, it starts wit A and ends with LOT...ginericLC said:Dave,
I'd disagree with you on the wear and weak link. These are Land Cruisers not some POS GM tranny. I've put over 150,000 miles on 80 series A442 and A440 trannies with no problems, and both of the rigs had perfectly functioning trannies that were never a problem when I sold them at 234k and 254k. I've had more wear from my Cruisers that need clutches replaced eventually than any Toyota auto I've owned. And Synchros, talk about a wear item. If you dislike them that is fine, but your logic of wear and weak link is a little weak if you ask me. I'm not a huge auto fan myself, (we drive a VW Passat instead of a Camry because the Camry isn't available in a manual), but in the big heavy Land Cruiser wagons they are hard to beat for ease of use and reliability.
Eric V.
Cruiser99 said:Hey Charles,
How good do you thing these Guatemala mechanics in planting a manual in my trucK,
Doron.
calamaridog said:Doron,
I'm not sure if they used the same 5spd with the V8. You can source the parts from Australia if you know someone over there perhaps.
calamaridog said:Doron,
I'm not sure if they used the same 5spd with the V8. You can source the parts from Australia if you know someone over there perhaps.
Cruiser99 said:Engine/tranny swap is just a thought that have been brewing in my head.
My rig, which is heavily modified and sees mostly expedition type use, has 65K miles. I cannot tell the difference in its operation between now and when I bought in brand new 9 years ago. I do here about transmission failure in these trucks though, which in my case will be disastrous because of the way I use the truck.
Hence, the thought.
Ducks said:I would assume they are the same one - H151.
Pedals are in the same place, unless it's bolt up issue, I'd guess that they use the same assembly and just bolt it to the other side. I can't see why on earth they'd make a whole new assembly just for RHD's. Course I can't figure out why we cant get all the cool trucks we want here in N. America either but that's another issue ehcalamaridog said:Are the AU ones right hand drive? That may complicate finding a pedal assembly...
calamaridog said:Well, it's either the H151F, R151F, or H150F is that helps. Are the AU ones right hand drive? That may complicate finding a pedal assembly...
4Rescue said:Pedals are in the same place, unless it's bolt up issue, I'd guess that they use the same assembly and just bolt it to the other side. I can't see why on earth they'd make a whole new assembly just for RHD's.
Ducks said:Also RHD and LHD don't matter for transmissions.
calamaridog said:I agree it makes sense but I don't know.