Fiji Bottled Water - True Cost?

DaktariEd

2005, 2006 Tech Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
The True Cost of Bottled Water

03 May 2001
Gland, Switzerland - In light of a new independent study WWF, the conservation organization, is urging people to drink tap water, which is often as good as bottled water, for the benefit of the environment and their wallets. According to the study, Bottled Water: Understanding a social phenomenon, commissioned by WWF, bottled water may be no safer, or healthier than tap water in many countries while selling for up to 1000 times the price. Yet, it is the fastest growing drinks industry in the world and is estimated to be worth US$22 billion annually. The study reveals that the bottled water market is partly fuelled by concerns over the safety of municipal water and by the marketing of many brands which portray them as being drawn from pristine sources and as being healthier than tap water. However, some bottled waters only differ from tap water in the fact that they are distributed in bottles rather than through pipes. In fact there are more standards regulating tap water in Europe and the US than those applied to the bottled water industry. "Our attitudes towards tap water are being shaped by the pollution which is choking the rivers and streams which should be veins of life," argues Richard Holland, Director of WWF's Living Waters Campaign. "We must clean up and properly protect these waters at source, and not just at the treatment works, so that we can all rest easy in drinking from the tap." The study acknowledges that while bottled water has the advantage of being generally safer in areas where tap water may be contaminated, boiling or filtering local water renders it safe at a much lower cost for people on a low income. However, according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), in terms of nutritional value, bottled water is no better than tap water. It may contain small amounts of minerals but so does tap water from many public municipal water supplies. Some consumers prefer bottled water to tap water for taste reasons. WWF argues that water companies have an important responsibility to ensure that they consistently produce water that is not only safe but also pleasant to drink. The study also finds that every year 1.5 million tons of plastic are used to bottle water. Toxic chemicals can be released into the environment during the manufacture and disposal of the bottles. Furthermore, a quarter of the 89 billion litres of water bottled worldwide annually are consumed outside their country of origin. Emissions of the green house gas carbon dioxide, caused by transporting bottled water within and between countries, contribute to the global problem of climate change. "Bottled water isn't a long term sustainable solution to securing access to healthy water," said Richard Holland. "Clean water is a basic right. Protecting our rivers, streams and wetlands will help ensure that tap water remains a service which delivers good quality drinking water for everyone at a fair price."

source: http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/freshwater/news/index.cfm?uNewsID=2250
 

goodtimes

Expedition Poseur
DaktariEd said:
The True Cost of Bottled Water

03 May 2001. . . Some consumers prefer bottled water to tap water for taste reasons. WWF argues that water companies have an important responsibility to ensure that they consistently produce water that is not only safe but also pleasant to drink.

I wish that the City of Tucson would read that. I don't drink tap water because, to me, it tastes bad. While it presents no health risk, I simply don't like it. So I buy a case of bottled water (in 500mL bottles) every year or two...then, like so many others, I filter my tap water and refill the water bottles until they are either lost, given away, damaged, or otherwise depart company with me. I prefer this to Nalgene bottles because if I run one over, lose it at someone elses house, etc., the economic cost to me is pretty much negligable.

Keeping in mind what I just said about my own personal use (and re-use) of PET bottles...you should NOT refill PET bottles. There are strict controls in the manufacturing and filling processes to eliminate the possibility of contamination Once the bottle is opened and the water consumed, the bottle is no longer free from contamination. Bacteria can, and does, grow inside of them. This bacteria does pose a health risk. So refill at your own risk. ;)
 

AxeAngel

Expedition Leader
A former coworker worked for a private equity company that owned FIJI and POM(pomegranate juice). Some food for though - their shipping costs are more than all other costs combined.

You don't want to even know what they did to the local sheep farmers that abutted their wells.
 

arktrekker

Adventurer
I was actually reading through this and got to this page before I realized the age of the thread. I have a fiji water bottle that I have been using for almost as long as this thread has been around. Of course I live very close to Hot Springs Arkansas and get most of our drinking water there in 5 gallon jugs straight from the source for free. Been using the same jugs for a while.
 

zidaro

Explorer
Big article on the further devastation that FIJI has caused lately, in Mother Jones Mag. couple months ago. Too bad it never reaches mainstream media.
Definite boycott to a company where the term "green" means only $$$
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,126
Messages
2,913,281
Members
231,813
Latest member
Kc_trailhawk
Top