geojag
Active member
I personally am not a fan of the Fiskars, but know they work well for a good many people. They are also a good choice for people who prefer to neglect their tools.
I have a couple issues with the - the bit shape (can't fix this) and the edge. As @jbaucom mentions above, the bit is a wedge, and a thick wedge at that. Most traditional axes have a bit of a hollow ground shape to the bit providing a thinner edge. Also, I prefer a curved cutting edge at the end of the bit, but the straight edge may be an advantage for easier sharpening.
The other issue is that the actual edge is essentially a Scandanavian grind. This results in a very thin edge that in my experience is brittle. With a belt sander or a piece of sandpaper and a mouse pad you can convex the edge which makes it much less prone to rolls or chipping.
Fiskars makes a splitting ax that is very good at its intended purpose, the wedge on that one is wider than on their axes and hatchets.
I think that the Fiskars works much better on soft wood, and that the wide wedge of the bit is a big disadvantage on hard woods.
I have a couple issues with the - the bit shape (can't fix this) and the edge. As @jbaucom mentions above, the bit is a wedge, and a thick wedge at that. Most traditional axes have a bit of a hollow ground shape to the bit providing a thinner edge. Also, I prefer a curved cutting edge at the end of the bit, but the straight edge may be an advantage for easier sharpening.
The other issue is that the actual edge is essentially a Scandanavian grind. This results in a very thin edge that in my experience is brittle. With a belt sander or a piece of sandpaper and a mouse pad you can convex the edge which makes it much less prone to rolls or chipping.
Fiskars makes a splitting ax that is very good at its intended purpose, the wedge on that one is wider than on their axes and hatchets.
I think that the Fiskars works much better on soft wood, and that the wide wedge of the bit is a big disadvantage on hard woods.