CreeksideKP
New member
No way that's hand calculated...my dodge gets 22+ on the overhead console, but only 17-18 if you divide the actual miles driven by how many gallons it takes.
25-27 MPG without hypermiling or trying? That's quite the lofty claim.
Plenty of owner feedback and even a TFL review show an empty 6.7l Cummins Ram 2500 getting +20mpg on the highway. Driving style and gearing plays a part in that, but also I think the Cummins has been known for being a bit more efficient than the comparable diesel V8's.
I don't know how much heavier the 5500 version is, but I'm sure its DRW setup will decrease fuel efficiency relative to the SRW setup.
It is an issue in the sense that every time you need to do major repairs or servicing, you have to take your truck into a dealership or repair shop for cab removal (unless you have a friend with a vehicle lift). Personally, I think the whole cab removal issue for F-250/350/550's is a stupid, and greedy, move on Ford's part. It certainly adds cost and complexity to certain procedures which would otherwise be fairly easy to accomplish.
It's only 2 hours for a pro to remove the cabs on the 2017's. They remove the Ford cabs to service the gas engines as well. GM is the same way, maybe an extra hour or two to get the cab off.
Ford's are more common from what I have seen of utility crews etc.
I have a 6.4 diesel ford F450. I have a large front area, (tall cabover section) but after a tune I get 10ish MPG's. Anywhere from 10-10.7 depending on speed and terrain.
Nope, lie o meter on the dash says 14 or so last time I looked.... The tune really messed with it (tuner may want it to look good?) but I was getting 7-8 before the tune.You mean it doesn't get 25mpg uphill pulling a trailer...... at least you are honest, as you can see others make lofty claims.
2 hours to remove? How much more time to put them back on? 1-2 hours? The problem is that the cab removal adds 3-4 more hours of labor costs to the overall repair and maintenance costs. It also precludes DIY-minded owners from tackling certain procedures in their own driveway.
The fact that some GM trucks require the same procedure only adds to my point; it's stupid on the manufacturer's part, and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it was intended to push people away from DIY maintenance and towards dealership maintenance.
Ford Tilt Cab.... new for 2020.
Complaining about it ain't going to solve the problem. Do you want to lean on the truck, do crappy job, and then repaint it? Or remove the cab from the truck and have plenty of room to work? On older vehicles we'd pull the engine instead of the cab. Same thing, often even more time..
The best solution is to attach the radiator, brakes, and AC to the frame. So the cab can be removed and replaced even quicker. Pop a couple plugs, disco the brake pedal, disco the steering. Design the Cab to have as few components attached to it as possible.
If the DIY guy can't pull the engine or cab, then the job is simply too big for them.
As crowded as these engine compartments are, it seems like a good idea to me.Some of the new Chevy 4500/5500 spy photos make it look like a tilt forward front section, not cab but hood/fenders.