You will never see an optical finder in the fujis. Only way your getting that is with the s pro series.
From what I've been told, the XT1's EVF is considerably better than that of the XE-1. I do find that I feel that same slight disconnect with the actual image that you speak of. I feel the "blackout" period between shots is noticeable, particularly when shooting action shots in the continuous shooting mode. I also find I have to trust in the image more than I do with the 5D. But, I continue to get great images out of the XT1.Fuji has been grabbing my interest lately, so I bought an XE-1 on eBay for relatively cheap ($250 AUD). I know it's not the XT-1, but it has a few similarities and it's a familiar form-factor for me as lately I've become used to rangefinders.
The XT-1 is a step ahead of the XE-1, but regardless I'm rather lukewarm about the camera in general. I just feel a bit 'disconnected' from the overall image. I see the benefit of the digital viewfinder, but I just can't get used to it after the wide-open viewfinder of my other camera. I'm glad I tested the water with the cheaper version
My X10 has both too. But still not a great view finder, but it works. The evf in my X-S1 is actually really good once you put the its an EVF out of your mind. Plus you can get extra information through the EVF that could not be available through a traditional optical finder. Once you get used to it its pretty nifty and handy.My Fuji X100 has both... you can use either, or a hybrid of the two.
From what I've been told, the XT1's EVF is considerably better than that of the XE-1. I do find that I feel that same slight disconnect with the actual image that you speak of. I feel the "blackout" period between shots is noticeable, particularly when shooting action shots in the continuous shooting mode. I also find I have to trust in the image more than I do with the 5D. But, I continue to get great images out of the XT1.
basicallynew stuff is always awesome. Nice glass. another thing I like a bout Fuji, and also Olympus is the glass. They take their time and design it right. You look at canon they have umpteen different 18-55mm range lenses instead of 1 or 2 awesome ones.
I have been considering lightening up my kit for some time. Coming from a Nikon D700 full frame with a 24-70 and 16-35, the smaller Fuji X-T1 seemed like it might just be a godsend.
Several weeks back, I took the plunge and ordered a X-T1 kit with the 18-55 lens and an additional 10-24. Short review: I love it.
The "kit" 18-55 is fantastic, and despite the variable aperture (f4 at 55mm), I honestly think it is comparable to the image quality of the Nikon 24-70 it replaced. My plan was to sell the 18-55 and pick up the 16-55 2.8, but I may just keep the 18-55 as it is considerably lighter and works wonderfully.
The 10-24 is on par with (if not a bit better than) the Nikon 16-35 it is replacing. The only ultrawide I prefer over this Fuji is the massive and expensive Nikon 14-24, which is just a complete pain to schlep around, doesn't take filters, etc.
The files coming out of the Fuji look great, Raw or Jpg. I use both Lightroom and Capture One for Raw processing, so I'm not bothered by any weirdness that the Adobe converters may have with the Fuji files.
For someone looking for a small kit, I don't think you can go wrong with the X-T1.