This was good technical learning experience for me but I as far as just shooting the moon by itself a full moon is like shooting the moon surface at high Noon. You lose the surface shadows and contrast.
I think in the future for full moons I would concentrate on either images like Mike's with it rising behind a cool foreground scene or like Joe said to turn around and just use the moon light to capture long exposure night shots of the landscape.
To really capture the contrasting details of the craters a half moon with the light shining across the surface like Joe did is more appealing to me.
I found the whole thing to be predictably disappointing. This was way overhyped. Technically, the moon was only about 5% bigger than it's own AVERAGE size (distance), and 11% bigger than it's minimum size. Those numbers got all twisted around in the media. 11% became 14% somehow, and 11% bigger than it's minima became "14% bigger than any time in the past 18 years." Somehow 30% brighter (a dubious claim by itself) became 30 times brighter as reported by one local radio station.
If you were clouded out, just wait. Next month it will be only 1% smaller than it was last night.
with that much moon light, might as well shoot it during day light... or am I missing something?
Blacker background at night, more contrast.
ah yes!
I was only thinking of long exposure at night.. with that much moon, it basically brightens up the entire sky.