Hierarchy of hard sided campers that handle the snow/winter?

DiploStrat

Expedition Leader
I'll throw in a ringer.

We have a reasonably four season camper, at least down to -15F with no freezing with the heat on. They actually made some bad decisions on placement of the water pump and heater, but with Total Composites panels it still works as long as the heat is kept a bit higher than really needed. The cat always liked that!

But here is the ringer - where are you going?

If you are going to ski resorts, backwoods camping in the winter, etc., then you may really use the four season capability and I am the first to love a hot shower when it is cold outside.

BUT, we are in Europe, touring to see things and a lot of campgrounds start closing as early as October, and stay closed until March or later. Many of the aires/stellplatz, while open, turn off the water when it starts to freeze. And worse, many of the attractions/museums/etc., close over the winter as well.

We have done it, all the way into December, and enjoyed the Christmas markets, but, as others have noted, do be sure that you really need a four season camper. N.B. We have encountered some of the same challenges in the Eastern US. We could get through the snow, but the water was off!

It really should not be that much more expensive to build a four season camper, but many manufacturers don't and I would be a bit wary of trying to retrofit the capability.

As always, YMMV. ;)


 

Skinhyfish

Observer
They are laughably one of the worst (if not the worst) when it comes to the composite campers. Their bravado comes from their marketing team and spawn of influencers. Pick Total Composites, Bison, Lemker, Globetrekker, Cascadia, ATO, etc etc they are all vastly superior than Scout.

Can I ask why? Just learning.
 

sn_85

Observer
Can I ask why? Just learning.

Their build quality is really terrible for the price you're paying. Acceptable if it was a DIY project you did in your driveway but not a production level camper that costs $35-40K. The composite panels are maybe an inch thick which is much less than the other brands. The way they join the panels is also inferior to other brands. They join them together with their extrusion like a butt joint whereas other companies are joining them with the extrusion like a rabbet joint. If you're into wood working a rabbet joint is much stronger than a butt joint. If you join their FB group there are issues with the panels coming apart from their extrusion. There are also issues with delamination, bubbling of the composites and leaks around doors, windows, etc. They also recommend resealing your camper yearly. No other composite camper builder advises you to reseal the camper yearly. Not OEV, TC, Bison, Cascadia, etc etc. They're obviously using inferior adhesives. Check out the FB group and you'll see condensation form around their extrusions. With any camper condensation is a concern, no matter if they're advertised as thermal transfer free. The idea is to mitigate this and the way Scout builds their campers makes them one of the worst when it comes to that. It's a poor 4 season camper because of that. There are a lot of pop-up campers that perform better than the Scout in winter.

There are also a lot of other QC issues like direct drilling into the composite with Home Depot grade wood screws, frequent electrical gremlins due to the Goal Zero that comes in their campers, odd component choices in a fridge that takes up seating and counter top space, a gigantic stove that takes up even more space, and general cheap feeling when compared to other composites. Just go to one of the Overland Expo's and feel and touch the campers. Scout is light duty compared to others. The cushions aren't comfortable and seating position in their campers are off too. The cushion stops about midway on your thighs and your leg is unsupported when seated. Just imaging sitting on a bar stool without leg support for hours, that's what sitting in a Scout feels like. I also found their campers to feel extremely tight inside, even on the Kenai. What I've also noticed is that people will buy their Scouts and then modify the heck out of the interior. Some have even gone so far as removing the interior cabinetry, electrical and water systems completely and doing their own. At that point it just makes more sense to go with a shell from one of the other companies and build it right from the start with higher quality panels and components of your choice.

If it sounds like I'm a Scout hater it's because I researched the heck out of these campers before I made a decision on mine and there were just so many short comings with the Scout for the money. These are just my opinions of course, others may feel differently and there are still a lot of satisfied Scout owners out there. Just not up to my standards if I'm flipping that much coin over.
 
Last edited:

TheDeliverator

New member
They are laughably one of the worst (if not the worst) when it comes to the composite campers. Their bravado comes from their marketing team and spawn of influencers. Pick Total Composites, Bison, Lemker, Globetrekker, Cascadia, ATO, etc etc they are all vastly superior than Scout.
...I researched the heck out of these campers before I made a decision on mine and there were just so many short comings with the Scout for the money. These are just my opinions of course, others may feel differently and there are still a lot of satisfied Scout owners out there. Just not up to my standards if I'm flipping that much coin over.
Whom did you end up choosing. I've been looking at Globetrekker recently and their solution for the habitat is different\interesting.
 

sn_85

Observer
Whom did you end up choosing. I've been looking at Globetrekker recently and their solution for the habitat is different\interesting.

I ended up with Total Composites from Bear Adventure Vehicles. When I was purchasing there were not as many options for shell builds. As well Bear was also willing to do custom interior choices and components as to what I wanted. Some of the composite builders have pre-set builds which wasn’t totally what I wanted. It’s taken longer than I hoped but that’s to be expected with a completely custom build. I think the TC shell also hit the right price point. While not cheap by any means it was in the price range that I wanted to spend for a fully assembled unit.

The Globetrekker looks very good as well. I’ve seen their unit in person and it’s also very impressive. The panels and extrusions seem to be a very high quality. The extrusions also have a T-track so you can mount things on the outside. The one thing I would keep in mind is that with Globetrekker I don’t believe the pricing includes the assembly cost, so you’re paying for the panels, extrusion and adhesives. Depending on the shop the assembly cost could be quite expensive. You will be getting a pretty unique high quality product however.
 

TheDeliverator

New member
I ended up with Total Composites from Bear Adventure Vehicles. When I was purchasing there were not as many options for shell builds. As well Bear was also willing to do custom interior choices and components as to what I wanted. Some of the composite builders have pre-set builds which wasn’t totally what I wanted. It’s taken longer than I hoped but that’s to be expected with a completely custom build. I think the TC shell also hit the right price point. While not cheap by any means it was in the price range that I wanted to spend for a fully assembled unit.
Thank you for the good info! I'll take a look a BAV

The Globetrekker looks very good as well. I’ve seen their unit in person and it’s also very impressive. The panels and extrusions seem to be a very high quality. The extrusions also have a T-track so you can mount things on the outside. The one thing I would keep in mind is that with Globetrekker I don’t believe the pricing includes the assembly cost, so you’re paying for the panels, extrusion and adhesives. Depending on the shop the assembly cost could be quite expensive. You will be getting a pretty unique high quality product however.

Understood about Globetrekker just being the "kit", and while they do have a list of builders... It's unknown to me if any do custom work.
 

Trail Talk

Well-known member
I have no experience with other brands but our OEV has "weathered" numerous trips during the Canadian winters. There are tips and tricks to be learned for coping with extreme cold but having a great cabin and reliable truck is a good beginning. The Webasto hydronic heater is getting noisy so I'm scheduling a service before this winter's travels.

Arctic Ocean 2024.jpeg
 

Skinhyfish

Observer
The Aterra by AT has has my attention the most for quality and lightness… curious about people’s opinions on warmth?

Bison and similar you can almost build out for $40k less. Hard to justify that big of a difference
 

calameda

Active member
The Aterra by AT has has my attention the most for quality and lightness… curious about people’s opinions on warmth?

Bison and similar you can almost build out for $40k less. Hard to justify that big of a difference

They use PP honeycomb rather than foam, and thin at that, so it isn't going to have the thermal resistance of a bridgeless foam shell. It's probably fine for most use, but it wouldn't be ideal for cold winter camping.

The Aterra was initially marketed (wasn’t it?) as 3 season for a reason. Propane as primary fuel, the 1/2” thick honeycomb panels, lots of windows, no gray tank all suggest less extreme conditions, ie not long term sub zero. Which isnt to say you can’t be comfortable in it for say a 3-4 days in the snow with the heat cranked. Just that it isn’t intended for polar expeditions. Few are!

As for price, if you like their component choices, aesthetics and layout, I think it’s more than fair. If you have someone else do custom interior buildout, you could readily exceed that 40k to do something similar. Interior build quality is v good from what I’ve seen, w thoughtful usability touches, though with an eye towards weight savings rather than ultimate durability. And cabover bed has limited headroom, will definitely bother some. But yeah their dry weight (listed as 1200 lbs base config) is really impressive. Id hazard you can’t get close to that with anything else similarly configured. (I should add that vendor supplied weights are often optimistic; I’m curious if any Aterra owners can verify.)

It will all come down to personal preferences and tradeoffs.
 
Last edited:

Spencer for Hire

Active member
Hi there B^2, Total Composites camper owner here. I'm one of the people who "sold my mass produced 4-season truck camper" (after 14 years of ownership) and decided to go with Total Composites. 🤪 My previous truck camper was an Alpenlite Saratoga 935. It was designed for a short-box 1-ton truck, had a 9 foot floor, and a single curb-side slide. Like you, I have two kids and our family of four has traveled the entire country in a truck camper. We even took 'em out of school and traveled in the camper for a full year (If you're interested you can read about that adventure HERE). Since you said that your primary cold weather use will be ski trips to Tahoe, IMO you can easily get away with a truck camper with a slide... a cold winter in Tahoe is not the same as cold winter in the Yukon. However, you should expect to use a lot of propane and/or electricity; slides are quite draft-ey. FWIW I never experienced any mechanical or structural issues with the slide.

With regard to your question about hierarchy; I'm not qualified to list the brands/models in any kid of logical order, but there are a handful of exceptional quality 4-season truck campers you might consider. Any of these would do just fine at Tahoe: Northern Lite, Wolf Creek, Northstar, Adventurer, Bigfoot, etc. I do think that Lance makes nice campers too.

Now, having had the Total Composites box for a little more than one year, I'm in agreement with IdaSHO; What's best for your family depends on your use case and your personal wants & needs. Due to their small internal volume, all these hard side habitats are relatively easy to heat in a typical winter environment... ya' know, the kind most of us in the continental US would choose to camp in. I had no problem keeping the truck camper warm using the propane furnace at 10ºF outside temps, and it's been the same with the Total Composites with a ~6800BTU diesel furnace. Both of them get condensation on the inside, this is due to the many openings that are cut through the wall and ceiling panels for window, hatches, water & power ports, etc... and the simple fact that we cook inside the camper and are continuously exhaling water vapor.

In my case I biased my build toward camping at the beach and in the desert. I chose to have a very large rear door; it's an insulated marine door but in sub-freezing temperatures moisture can condense on it's frame exactly the same as it does on my windows & hatches The thing is, I wanted this feature and is just so spectacular when open that I wouldn't trade it for anything! Importantly, this hasn't reduced our snow camping one bit.

It's unfortunate that other folks here have hijacked your post just to talk ********** about their competition. If you want additional factual information about Total Composites campers please feel free to DM me or create a new forum post on that subject.

Cheers!
-Mark
View attachment 841616


Do you have any more pics of the TC camper? Thank You.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,694
Messages
2,909,181
Members
230,892
Latest member
jesus m anderson
Top