CoastalDefender
Explorer
Dont do it, it's full of low payments, fun times, and great mileage compared to any four wheeler you drive...
:elkgrin:
:elkgrin:
Before you sign on the dotted line, educate yourself on the new "improved" KLR:
http://tinyurl.com/2wgco93
I'd shop for a lightly used older KLR, or a new DR650, V-Strom, F650, XR650.
Your not helping me either Justin!!!!!
The only other bike I would really consider would be a DR650.
Ive pretty much decided on a KLR because I want RTW type of bike, offroad capable, that doesnt have the price tag of the KTM or BMW.
One of the local KLR riders has said, more than once, that:
"The best farkle for a KLR, is a different bike to ride off road".
YMMV, to each their own, etc.
Just sayin' . . .
:ylsmoke:
That's been my impression. Way too big and heavy for off-road. And yet it's not very good on-road compared to any number of other road bikes. So... other than being cheap, what's the attraction?
I've done ~5500 miles over a two-week stretch on the KLR. It's no Wee-Strom, but no complaints and I would not have enjoyed the Wee riding across Labrador as much as I enjoyed the KLR. I think a DR or XR would have been more fun on the Trans-Lab, but I wouldn't have wanted to ride one all those highway miles to get there and back. The KLR just seems to fit right there in the middle better than anything else we're getting in the USA right now, or so it seems to me at least.
John
That seems to be the general consensus from what Ive heard. Not great at either but ok at both. Thats what Im looking for. I want to be able to do long range trips in semi comfort, do some mild offroading, and not have to sell my first born to be able to afford it.
As much as I want one, the KTM or the BMW are just not in the budget anytime for the foreseeable future.
I disbelieve anyone who tells me they can semi-comfortably ride 70 fully loaded....except for maybe downhill.