IBS or National Luna

texascrane

Adventurer
Hi,
I'm thinking about adding an aux battery to my 100-series. I've looked at both the National Luna and the IBS offerings. They both seem to do about the same thing as far as I can tell. Are there any reasons to choose one over the other? Thanks.
 

fireball

Explorer
I've had really good luck with my T-Max controller which is a small fraction of the price of those two options you mention. You can also build your own system using Blue sea components that will work just as well and be less costly than the NL and IBS.

Also, make sure you really really need a DBS....I bought into the hype and thought I needed it but honestly it is a huge expense and takes a ton of time, adds another 100# to the front of the truck and for the style of camping we do it is really unnecessary. If you are doing lots of remote solo trips, or staying parked for days at a time it makes more sense.
 

unseenone

Explorer
NL in my opinion does not hold up, plenty of issues people have had in this section of the forum. I use Traxide. There are plenty of alternatives out there.
 

Yuman Desert Rat

Expedition Leader
I like the the controller of the IBS system better. It's not as finicky as the NL controller and offers more mounting options. Both have done a great job for me over the years. Be sure that it is what YOU need,of course. There are a myriad of oprions out there.
 

texascrane

Adventurer
Thanks for the pointer to the Blue Sea product. That ML-ACR looks really slick. The fact that it's sealed is a big plus for me. I also like the fact that it's dual-sensing. I know the IBS can do that but from what I can tell, the NL can't. I think that's a useful feature if I ever decide to go solar.

If I was installing it myself, I might prefer a packaged "solution" like the IBS or National Luna. But realistically I'm probably going to pay somebody to do this in order to make sure it's done right. My install is going to require some fabrication that's beyond what I've go the tools to do and electrical stuff (beyond something like hooking up a winch or tapping a circuit) makes me really nervous.
 

KevinsMap

Adventurer
It is really easy. Hook all the negatives to the chassis as a common ground.

This is a bit vague in a potentially problematic way. Not wrong - It is all properly clear in your links... but I'm just going to add this simple summary:

Yes, all negatives to earth common, which in a vehicle is the (properly earth connected) body/chassis. But only at a single point on that chassis, or if at distributed points, those points must be connected by sufficiently robust earth cables. Meaning such robust connection cables for all paths between any ground points used, anywhere on the body/chassis, and including body to frame to engine etc. Modern vehicles are intentionally not designed to use distributed earth ground paths relying solely on the metal structure.

In other words, never use the vehicle body/chassis as an electrical earth path. This has the potential to float earth potential at different levels in different locations, causing no end of headaches - especially for electronic systems.

Your links are very helpful, skygear :) Thanks!
 
Last edited:

dstock

Explorer
+1 on the BlueSea ACR

I had the NL and had issues (and others have as well), switched to the BlueSea ACR (500amp) earlier this year and it has worked flawlessly ever since.
 

1Louder

Explorer
I have had problems with my National Luna. I would give the Bluesea a try. If I decide to keep a dual battery setup I am eventually going to switch.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,941
Messages
2,922,523
Members
233,156
Latest member
iStan814
Top