Kingsize24
Well-known member
No it wouldn't. If the states get control of the land, they have no obligation to keep it public. The only reasons states want control is to make $$$ from it.
I get yall's point, I do, it's just a completely different viewpoint and opinion for me. But my main goal is for the lands to be in the hands of those that steward it best. And of all the places I've been too all across the US, the state parks seem better run and maintained, minus the big name high monetary intake areas.