Just goes to show we all adapt. This would not work in the west this summer since we've been under fire bans pretty much since May and continue to many places. So you'd have to carry out all your trash. This is really SOP anyway, campfires are hit or miss (not just backcountry, including commercial campgrounds like this year) so do this stuff long enough you eventually figure out a way to wash & reuse.Paper plates and cups, toss them in the campfire afterwards.
This is not the case in the mountains of Colorado. My Tacoma feels big compared to my Hilux. Although the turning radius of rack & pinion I have to admit helps, any time you have wheel base and track width more than a CJ2A you're doing mutli-point turns on switchbacks. Either way you have to accept pinstripes are part of using your truck. But sometimes even the little bit of size of a F150/C1500 makes squeezing in tree and rocks uncomfortable. We even see it with 100/200s over 4Runner/Tacoma, inches do add up. But it depends on how far you want to push it on trails. Most dirt roads and mild trails are doable in anything as long as you have clearance, it's the mild to harder stuff where it matters.
That's the bottom line. Everything is compromise. I long ago accepted that 120"+ wheel bases are acceptable to have a bit of elbow room in the cab and a pickup bed. Some guys feel the same about a wagon over a FJ40. I personally don't want to deal with dragging around toys so I adapt my outfit to fit within the constraints of a Hilux/Truck/Tacoma. The overhang is what I really notice, I tend to hang up more than Cruisers and SUVs and since I don't yet have a rear bumper I have to be careful not to tear off things or dent the box.
We are lite campers. A good sized tent, sleeping gear, couple 5 gal water jugs, firewood, and food. I'm used to cutting weight and fluff as a backpacker. I don't need 3 tables, 2 awnings, and enough food to last an Armageddon. Kids don't take toys. They love to play with whatever they find. Or if we're near water, they spend the whole day playing.
I used to take my bikes (road or mountain). But even gave that up for a pair of trail running shoes. Keep it light, go far, and have fun.
I personally don't want to deal with dragging around toys so I adapt my outfit to fit within the constraints of a Hilux/Truck/Tacoma.
I've personally never liked the idea of towing something to the trails, having to end up where you start removes a lot of the exploration flexibility and just seems to add steps/complexity to every trip but to each their own.
I do like plunking around in the truck, but find it very limiting and slow compared to where I can put a mountain or dirt bike. Never fails, I'll be out in the truck and see some single track out of the corner of my eye...and can't go zipping down it like I would on the bike.
So...what I like do is go base camp at different areas with the truck...and dissect with one of the bikes whether it be pedal or motor. Did that yesterday...parked just off the main road in area I haven't explored yet...and rode the bike back in 80 miles. So much easier dealing with washboards on the dirt bike than in the truck..."ohh is that some single track I see off to the side there!?" Braaaaap!
Ok I can certainly see the appeal of that. I should really start bringing my mountain bike on more trips, now that I'm thinking about it I have no good reason not to. I could still do thru-routes but make camp earlier and explore the area on two wheels.
I do really like my Rover as a midpoint though(it's not a pristine Range Rover Classic like you tend to see, total trail beater. I was looking for a Disco, XJ or YJ as a trail toy but when a mechanically-solid, cosmetically-beat RRC popped up for $2500 it was too cool to resist). It's compact, nimble, street legal and can fit a few people with gear if you toss some stuff on the safari rack. The effective size difference with the Tacoma is huge because I'm not nearly as worried about driving through brush or cutting it close to trees and rocks.
Yeah? I suppose you mean the reason the Tacoma and the '91 before it work for me is skis fit in the bed and MTBs in a hitch rack don't seriously tax power and space them like a dirt bike or side-by-side would? The slight size advantage of a Tacoma over a full size off road comes into play getting into base camps, too.Don't you ride mountain bikes and ski?
I like to do it all...but it is pretty rare that I only take the truck. The truck is the means to get the toys to the trail head. Love my Tacoma, and I make it work...but yeah there are times I wish it was little bigger. Haven't been on the bike for 2.5 months...healing up from some injuries, so was using the truck in the mean time to plunk around. Man...forgot how much I prefer the bike over the truck for back country travel. Just zip through stuff that would of given the truck trouble, actaully a few spots I went through even the "small" Tacoma wouldn't of fit....plus it would rattled my fillings out skating across the wash boards. Don't even really feel them on the bike, kept on thinking yesterday...so glad I am not dragging the truck down this.
Couple few guys there doing just that, trucks and campers parked just off the main road. While the bikes, quads, and SXS's are on the back roads and trails.
The size/weight of the truck really doesn't become a factor unless you start getting into the very technical rock-crawling (Rubicon-like trails) or straight-up mud bogging. For nearly all of the 4x4 'trails' I have come across, if a Tacoma or 4-door Jeep can fit, so too can a fullsize or 3/4 ton (albeit with more pin striping).
Everybody says this but they must never have to sit behind the full size vehicles taking forever on every obstacle or tight squeeze. An where there are forests or switch backs or rockfall this can be a problem. You hardly have to be on the Rubicon for a full size to be an issue.
Still plenty of reasons to go full size and plenty of trails where it is not an issue but to say you need to be at Rubicon levels to notice is ridiculous. Just having to turn around on a trail with a blockage is almost impossible with a full size a lot of places w/o backing up a long ways.
Everybody says this but they must never have to sit behind the full size vehicles taking forever on every obstacle or tight squeeze. Where there are forests or switch backs or rockfall this can be a problem. You hardly have to be on the Rubicon for a full size to be an issue.
Still plenty of reasons to go full size and plenty of trails where it is not an issue but to say you need to be at Rubicon levels to notice is ridiculous. Just having to turn around on a trail with a blockage is almost impossible with a full size a lot of places w/o backing up a long ways.
But here in the northeast and Great Lakes region, if a 4runner or Tacoma can fit, so too can a full size truck. Really, the only trails that I can think of where a fullsize would be hindered due to size and/or weight would be some of the old skidder and snowmobile trails....but those are usually off-limits to highway vehicles anyways and you're better off getting onto an ATV if you want to go down them.