You can get clearcoat that does a decent job of protecting epoxy. I have a generic Chinese road bike that is clear over carbon with ~80,000 miles on it... guessing 4-5,000 hrs outdoors. It's starting to look a little shoddy; the clear is brittle and has chipped off in some spots. I did not think clearcoat would be adequate for the outside, but maybe the dash if you cover it when you can.
I think the decision between carbon and FG for walls depends on things like how large the panels are, how insulated you want them to be, how stiff (or flexible!) they need to be, and how much you care about impact protection. Since carbon is much stiffer, it makes more sense on thin panels. On thicker panels the FG is stiff enough, and is better for impact. You could add kevlar to the carbon for better impact, but $$$ and it's a bear to work with. I don't know if you have a specific need for high insulation, but when you get a pretty modest amount of insulation the need for ventilation tends be the biggest heat loss. Plus we are in little boxes, and thick insulation takes away from interior space. Tradeoffs...
No build thread, but the parts I did with carbon came out fine... or at least as good as the FG parts. AFAIK. I haven't finished yet, so no real testing. The floor/base is 4 layers of 11oz carbon on each side, plus a layer of 1808 FG on the top, 2" core. The door is 2 layers of 11oz cabon and one layer of 1700, 1.5" core. The FG adds essentially zero bending strength because it's much less stiff, but it helps with impact.
I've attached a spreadsheet with some cost and weight numbers for different panel options. In the first two examples with PVC foam, the one with FG skins would be quite a bit more robust in my "wack it with a hammer" testing, and yet it's only .12 lb/ft^2 heavier. Stiffness is carbon's forte...
Wet layup on foam is inherently "lumpy". Getting the foam (edge-glued pieces) perfectly flat is not easy... then every time there is a cloth overlap there is a ridge. My ridges are ~.5mm tall which doesn't seem like a lot, but it's very obvious. I fared them a little, but they are still obvious. If that bothers you the only way I know to eliminate it, is to use many layers of thin cloth and sand and fare a lot, or use the thick cloth and sand and fare a crazy amount, or don't make any panels larger than your cloth width, and then only sand and fare the edges (assuming that you make the panels then join them). You could also make molds, but that's a lot of work and isn't sensible for a one-off. Sanding this stuff is not fun. Every time, me and my entire garage are covered in very tiny glass shards...
In my research regarding cheap XPS core, there have been too many failures for me to trust it alone. PVC foam is *much* stronger, and the cells are bigger which gives it a better bond with the epoxy. The last two examples have sort of a wood "frame" inside the core, plus the XPS is textured with a wallpaper roller and epoxy worked in to give it more strength at the surface.
I have experience building another camper 20 years ago. It was most like the cheap option at the bottom, except I used construction glue instead of epoxy and a thicker external coat of FG. If I had this to do again, I think I'd pick that method. Easier, less mess, cheaper, robust enough. Maybe I'd just do a thicker FG on the outside and skip the ply on that surface. The only downside is that you have some wood, so need to make sure external penetrations are sealed, which isn't a big deal, IMO. Idasho built his camper like this too, and it seems to be doing great... but the build thread was deleted?