LC 100 thoughts

mph

Expedition Leader
I am looking at a 99 LC 100 with 126,000 miles on it...Maintenance is up to date...I am a little nervous buying a car with that many miles. But, I know LCs seem to last forever. Should I be worried? What kind of life expectancy could I expect? Thanks
 

spressomon

Expedition Leader
There are, now, quite a few folks closing in on 200k miles (I'm at 167k) with several in the 200-300k miles. And even one I just noticed with 400k. Having said that lower miles, all things being equal, are preferred. But if its been taken care of; nothing more than door dings; the PM work was performed as scheduled; and not rust ridden underneath (this is a biggy...get down and under it and inspect it...all bets are off if its spent its life where they put salt down on winter roads); and everything checks out I'd go for it.
 

Klierslc

Explorer
What are your plans for it? If you plan on wheeling it, the earlier front axles were a little weaker. Other than that, no worries with that many miles.
 

spressomon

Expedition Leader
What are your plans for it? If you plan on wheeling it, the earlier front axles were a little weaker. Other than that, no worries with that many miles.

For clarification purposes only: Its not the front axles. Its the difference between the spider gear pinions, and more appropriately the carrier itself: '98-'99 had 2-pinion and '00+ had 4-pinion. However there have been documented failures with 2 and 4 pinion designs.

The most prudent advice would be to add the ARB front air locker before the calamity occurs. This way you preserve all the internal parts and associated costs. The ARB carrier is significantly more rigid preventing most if not all the flex associated with the OEM failure points.

FWIW: You don't necessarily have to be a hard core wheeler to experience the failure. Think of the fix as a preventative maintenance item...or insurance ;-)
 

Klierslc

Explorer
For clarification purposes only: Its not the front axles. Its the difference between the spider gear pinions, and more appropriately the carrier itself: '98-'99 had 2-pinion and '00+ had 4-pinion. However there have been documented failures with 2 and 4 pinion designs.

The most prudent advice would be to add the ARB front air locker before the calamity occurs. This way you preserve all the internal parts and associated costs. The ARB carrier is significantly more rigid preventing most if not all the flex associated with the OEM failure points.

FWIW: You don't necessarily have to be a hard core wheeler to experience the failure. Think of the fix as a preventative maintenance item...or insurance ;-)

Minor details-- it makes the front end go crunch, lightens the wallet and ruins everybody's day.:sombrero:

Thanks for the clarification though, that is good to know as I may move into a 100 in about 10 years or so.....
 

mph

Expedition Leader
Thanks for the insights...I totally agree with the ARB front...it was going to be one of my first modifications...
 

Hltoppr

El Gringo Spectacular!
126K is not a lot of miles on a Cruiser...heck...I think only one of the Cruisers I've owned had under 150K!

-H-
 

Skim

Explorer
How many miles does not matter as much as a complete service history consistent with the manufacturer schedule.
 

mph

Expedition Leader
So, should I pull the trigger? 126k, $11,500...I am in no rush...I would like to get something in the next two months. Thoughts? Should I take the plunge? Or, look for something with lower miles?
 

murphy744

Adventurer
I'm in the same boat...looking for a 100. In the end, don't settle or you will regret it. Take your time and get exactly what you want...If you have a max milage in mind, then wait for that cruiser.....my 2cents:sombrero:
 

trunk monkey

New member
You say maintenance is up to date, but make sure the timing belt has been done. If not, it can be a spendy item and/or good leverage in the price.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
190,044
Messages
2,923,464
Members
233,330
Latest member
flipstick
Top