Multiple gun purchases???

wesel123

Explorer
FourByLand said:
I am not anti- "right to bear"... just didn't understand the big deal about not being able to purchase more than one at a time.

I know that in times of chaos such as "Katrina" it becomes pretty hairy and you have to do what you have to for your family... well, even when your neighbors are throwing up gang signs (good luck Wil!)

Anyway thanks for the discussion!

Alright I need to chime in here cuz it seems as though I need to defend my "right" to purchase Fire arms. Im am a gun collector, I've been around them my whole life, I have never once used a gun against a person or animal, I plain and simply enjoy them.

So if i want to but 50 guns at one time I should be able to. It is what this great nation is founded on and how it was created. I know times are different than they were in the 1700's, but there are so many unknowns in this current world of ours..

Ok Im done...still ticked but done....
 
Last edited:

Schattenjager

Expedition Leader
Gun laws like the "one at a time" rule really underscore the ignorance of the anti-gun community and illustrates the emotional tide they ride. A person can only use one gun at a time - realistically anyway... This "control element" is not so much to regulate the amount of guns you buy at one time, but rather a surreptitious means of gaining influence, and respect, aimed at greater control down the road.

A good example of ignorance is the ban on assault rifles vs. hunting rifles. By design, most assault rifles are made to injure - not kill - since it demoralizes troops and takes other soldiers out of action while they tend the wounded.

Hunting rifles are designed to kill. Most do it from long range and with great power. If I could really pick my battles, I'd rather face a punk with an AR than seasoned shooter with a .375 H&H anyday.

Really, I would prefer a nice beech in North-eastern Australia, but you know what I mean...:sombrero:
 

jh504

Explorer
You are absolutly right, while some laws really dont seem like a big deal, all gun control laws are aimed at getting a hand hold towards even stiffer gun control laws. That is the stategy that anti gun politicians use, to take our liberties away slowly so that we arent as aware of it. I feel for anyone who is a gun collector in Cali, I would be driven insane. I am currently building an AR copycat M16 Viper ( http://www.m16clinic.com/viper/ ) and I dont ever want to have to worry about it being taken from me becuase some psycho couldnt deal with his problems in a mature way.
 

snipecatcher

Adventurer
cyclic said:
Sorry, the post on Texas was wrong. You can buy as many guns as you want, there is no limit. You do have to fill out a multi-firearm purchase form is you buy 2 or more at one time. Thats it, get out your check book. :friday:

I believe you were referring to my post. Yes, I stated that you can buy as many guns in a day as you would like. I sell them. ;)
 

wesel123

Explorer
To lighten things up... I went and shot my Sig 556 this weekend and all I can say is WOW, what an amazing weapon.

500 rounds and not 1 jam or miss fire. Seems to kick less than my old M4 and talk about accurate. I mounted an EoTech...did I say WOW.....:yikes:
 

jh504

Explorer
wesel123 said:
To lighten things up... I went and shot my Sig 556 this weekend and all I can say is WOW, what an amazing weapon.

500 rounds and not 1 jam or miss fire. Seems to kick less than my old M4 and talk about accurate. I mounted an EoTech...did I say WOW.....:yikes:

I am jealous.
 

Schattenjager

Expedition Leader
wesel123 said:
To lighten things up... I went and shot my Sig 556 this weekend and all I can say is WOW, what an amazing weapon.

500 rounds and not 1 jam or miss fire. Seems to kick less than my old M4 and talk about accurate. I mounted an EoTech...did I say WOW.....:yikes:


I hope your butt grows together...

J/K - post a pic so we can see her all dressed out! :jumping:
 

DaktariEd

2005, 2006 Tech Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
I have to say, I am very impressed that this thread has maintained its "composure" on a topic that nearly always generates very heated exchanges. Seriously! I even hesitated to wade in here with an opinion, for fear of upsetting the discussion, but here it is.

I am a gun owner, and a strong defender of the 2nd Amendment.
That amendment was put there for a reason: to safeguard the freedoms the founders fought and died for. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness springs to mind.

I fully respect everyone's right to choose to own a firearm or not. That's the beauty of this country. We have the choice. I have a choice. If you choose not to own a firearm, great! That's your right. But don't tread on MY right to own firearms (as many as I desire) and protect myself.

And I get pretty riled up when someone thinks they can make that choice for me. And that applies also to whether I want to buy more than a single firearm at one time. I cannot envision doing that, but ultimately it is MY choice.

As for why these laws limiting purchases to one a month? I agree with a previous post that places it squarely on the gun-control special interests that have determined that they can accomplish their agenda a bite at a time.

Case in point, just look at taxation. It was virtually non-existent prior to World War II. The war in fact was funded almost entirely on bond money. Money loaned to the US government and paid back afterwards. After the war, the government initiated an income tax scheme and found how easily Americans "did their duty" without serious complaint. So the taxes started to escalate.

Now look at what we have! Most of us have to work nearly half the year to pay taxes.

So, too, the gun controllers intend to slowly take away our RIGHT to keep and bear arms.

How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time...

Just my 2 cents...

safari.gif
 

DaktariEd

2005, 2006 Tech Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
wesel123 said:
To lighten things up... I went and shot my Sig 556 this weekend and all I can say is WOW, what an amazing weapon.

500 rounds and not 1 jam or miss fire. Seems to kick less than my old M4 and talk about accurate. I mounted an EoTech...did I say WOW.....:yikes:

Wow! I had to look that one up.
What a beautiful rifle.
And the price tag! Wow!

safari.gif
 

Chas Stricker

Adventurer
Howdy All,
I agree that gun controls breed more gun controls. We have enough laws, if thoroughly enforced, to get the job done. As stated earlier honest people will follow the laws and criminals will do what they want. If I haven't broke a law that would prevent me from buying or owning guns then let me be. My fear would be that laws will slowly change so that I might "have" to break the "law" in order to keep my "right" to bear arms. That will be a tough choice! I'm hoping for no new restrictions for honest folks. I'm also impressed with the intelligence on both sides of the issue in this thread.
Chas
 

nickatnite

Observer
FourByLand said:
I know that in times of chaos such as "Katrina" it becomes pretty hairy and you have to do what you have to for your family...!

We REALLY do not want to embellish on that topic. A good many people in the US don't really know what happened down here (even though some of it was on the news).

We are STILL fighting guns issues in New Orleans (even with the increased crime rates). The other day when President Bush was in town, we had 6 murders ina 12 hr time frame!

Here is a little excerpt from one of our local sporting magazines.

By Gordon Hutchinson
January 29, 2008

You don’t lose gun rights in traffic stop

“Do I look like a thug?”

The gentleman who asked this question was dressed casually and stylishly. He looked like a middle-class male, about 40 years of age. No obvious tattoos, he had short-cropped hair. Tall, average weight, well-spoken, to my eyes he looked like anything but a street criminal, and I said so.

“I travel to New Orleans most days of the week on business,” he said. “There is a certain corner I take every day. I know the intersection is ‘No Left Turn’ from 7 to 9 a.m. each weekday. I know this. I turned left one morning at a quarter to nine, and was instantly pulled over by a marked NOPD unit.

“The female officer got out and walked up to my car, and I told her, ‘I’m sorry. I know better. I simply wasn’t paying attention when I made that left turn.’

“When she asked for my driver’s license, insurance and registration, I told her there was a gun in the glove box, just to warn her. She walked around to the other side of the car, opened the door, opened the glove box and took the gun out. It was a little .25 automatic. It wasn’t even loaded.

“She proceeded to write me the ticket. When she gave me the ticket, she made some sort of quick spiel about where I could come to get the gun back if I brought a receipt for it. I didn’t follow what she was telling me, but she kept the gun.

“When I asked her if she was going to give me a receipt, she told me: ‘The way I look at it, I didn’t know you had it, and you don’t know I’ve got it.’ She left with the gun.”

To condense the rest of the story from the gentleman’s tale, he called a friend in the department who spoke an expletive, and asked for the ticket number on the traffic citation that had been issued.

The gentleman was told his friend ran into the officer about a week later, and recognized her by the name tag on her uniform. When he asked about the .25 automatic, she responded she still had it — she was unfamiliar with the procedures for turning in a seized firearm.

The gentleman informed me he got his gun back. He never found out if any punishment or reprimand was issued to the officer that illegally seized his gun. He never pursued the issue any further — unfortunately. This incident occurred more than a year after Hurricane Katrina.

In the course of research for our book on the confiscation of firearms in the aftermath of the hurricane, we heard a number of similar stories. They all followed the same vein: A citizen is pulled over in a traffic stop. The NOPD officer takes a gun from the citizen, and asks if the citizen has a receipt for the gun. When the answer is no, the gun is seized, and the citizen is informed if they will show up at a specific precinct with proof of ownership, they can have the gun back.

A recent gentleman caller on a New Orleans radio talk show described having a personal handgun seized during a traffic stop. This particular gun was passed down through his family — it was an heirloom — and he wanted it back. This gentleman stated he had placed numerous calls to different divisions within the department, and had been unable to get any information on the whereabouts of his gun.

A local gun store informed me they have had numerous citizens buy guns, only to return and beg for a copy of their receipt to get the gun back after it had been seized during a traffic stop in New Orleans.

Apparently the impending lawsuit by the Second Amendment Foundation and the National Rifle Association seeking redress and return of the guns seized by law enforcement in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina has had little effect on the NOPD. If the stories we’re hearing are truthful, the police are still illegally confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens.

I spoke with two separate practicing attorneys — one works for the state of Louisiana and the other is also a commissioned law-enforcement officer. Both stated if the police were taking possession of guns from motorists during any sort of investigation, and the gun was not germane to the investigation, the seizure amounted to theft.

“Armed robbery by cop,” one said.

When I asked a good friend, a retired NOPD officer, about the practice, he stated it was a fairly common practice to take guns from motorists before the hurricane. He said he thought the practice had died out since the hurricane, however.

When I stuttered outrage over this practice, and told him it was illegal, his reply was: “Gordon, I didn’t say it was legal. I said they did it.”
 

Schattenjager

Expedition Leader
I truly wish I were surprised.

One of my clients had an unfortunate run in with 'the law' two years ago - different circumstances, but in the end he had two cars seized and spent over the value of one to get them back.

He told me - 'they will just walk in and take your property or your freedom until you can afford to buy it back.' He was found innocent of the original charges and was of course, NOT reimbursed for his trouble.

They say to 'do the right thing.' According to them, that is... :bigbossHL:
 

jh504

Explorer
I am not suprised either. In fact when I was working in NO and carrying a firearm I was pulled over by a police officer and I neglected to mention the fact that I had a legal firearm in the vehicle. This is not a practice that I would condone in any other circumstances but at the time, there were just too many questions about law enforcement in the area. Having said that, I am very good friends with a number of officers down there and I have to point out that there are some very good cops risking their life in La. It is a shame what a few of the wrong people will do when given authority, including law enforcement, military, and politicians.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,563
Messages
2,906,959
Members
230,666
Latest member
Cvonruex

Members online

Top