rruff
Explorer
Consumer Reports reliability measure is only “expected” reliability this can be based off of previous generations and I think what hurts the Tacoma more in this instance is that this generation has been around longer since 2015 and the more data that comes in the more that “expected” reliability is well a more reliable indicator.
From 2016-2021 the Tacoma had 5, 4, 4, 1, 4, 5 (3.83 avg). Transmission and fuel system were the culprits in 2019. No idea how that happened since I don't think anything was new that year. 2011-2015 were all 5s. So an "expected reliability" score of 3 makes no sense unless they are only going by the prior 3 years.
Long term is a big unknown on any vehicle until the design has been around a long time. But the manufacturer track record would be the best place to look IMO. Tacomas were built (assembled) in Fremont CA 1995-2009, Baja since 2002, and Texas since 2010. I've seen anecdotal reports that Baja has the best QC. But I think you'd have a hard time pinning anything on location of assembly, or showing that reliability is "slipping" (even relatively) except for that one year (2019).
Last edited: