T-Willy
Well-known member
Thanks for that! I’ll for sure check out your other post as that’s exactly the kind of info I’d love to see.
I am also taking a “wait and see” approach on the Defender’s ability to do remote travel and that will be impacted hugely by reliability. I am excited at the potential for the platform though — as an Overlander, it checks a ton of boxes on my list. Payload, the third seat in the front, ample room in the back for dogs and gear, a roof load rating that can hold more than an occasional piece of wood, and it has a published wading depth which is apparently very rare for NA-market vehicles for some reason. And when I built my ‘dream’ Defender it came out at a comparable cost to a similarly built Gladiator - but the LR had a much nicer interior and comfort features, so it’s priced very competitively to similarly performing “off the lot” rigs. I’m really hopeful it is also robust and reliable because thats the last - and most important box for it to check. Can’t wait to see how many of these make roll the odo over 6 figures a few times to see what the high-mileage/rough-mileage reliability is.
Hear, hear. I would add that Land Rover deserves credit for pushing the market, or at least the North American market, with the Defender. I've been waiting years for a potential companion or replacement for our 80 series, which we've had since new and still use for remote tours. Until Defender, there's been no wagon on the market that is similarly mid-sized with excellent off road capability and a payload over 1900 lbs. For me, Defender's reliability will be the last and most important box to check.
Edit: And your point about rough-mileage reliability is key. That's what I'm particularly interested to see--how it withstands years of frequent use under heavy loads on brutal dirt roads, like Baja. It's ability to deliver great trips on brutal roads year after year for a decade or two without break-downs is what I'm after.
Last edited: