plainjaneFJC
Deplorable
Which is crazy - who would want a tire in the bed, I guess someone who never uses the bed?🤷‍♂️33 for the Colorado. The Bison package moved its 35s to the bed because they don't fit.
Which is crazy - who would want a tire in the bed, I guess someone who never uses the bed?🤷‍♂️33 for the Colorado. The Bison package moved its 35s to the bed because they don't fit.
That would include the majority of people that buy this kind of "truck".Which is crazy - who would want a tire in the bed, I guess someone who never uses the bed?🤷‍♂️
I don't pay much attention so when you mentioned this I went to build a Ranger and all they are offering me is Super Crew. Well that stinks. But honestly the shape and size of new midsize trucks doesn't work for me for a lot of reasons so if push did ever come to shove I'd probably move to a full size anyway so I guess it's not absolutely show stopping. I don't need cab space, I need cargo space. And I'm 6' tall so a 5' long bed doesn't exactly work if you want to lay down in it.They look better in person, honestly.
The real travesty is the total abandonment of the extended cab/long bed body style.
The at4 and trail boss is not a selectable locker, you have to spin the wheels quite a bit to get it to lurch forward.There are a few noteworthy trim packages for the Colorado and Canyon trucks
AT4
AT4X
ZR2
Trail Boss
ZR2 and ATX4 both seem to have the selectable front and rear lockers, taller factory lift, better ground clearance, and better approach and departure angles. They also have those fancy dancy shocks.......
The AT4 and Trail Boss trim levels are about $5k - $7k cheaper than ZR2 and AT4X equipped trucks
I've never owned a vehicle with a front locker and am not 100% certain I need this feature....