Agreed, and yes a very good point. I have the same issue with my YJ, where the odo/ speedo are 10% slower than actual, so i calculate as follows: miles x 1.1 / total gal used.
Here's what I did on the van, please let me know if you think this works. I always fill to absolute top based on sound (vs pump click-off because that varies wildly), so shouldn't be much variation there. There is some margin of error between temp/ altitude, gas formulation/ ethanol content, driving style and GPS error rate, so obviously the more data points to average together, the better the data.
Before and after the new tires, I averaged my speedometer vs. GPS speed via the Torque ap. My speedo and OBDII agree within +/- .7MPH. After the tires were replaced, I took an average of OBD vs GPS differential readings and came up with a 6% difference between "actual" and measured speed. Taking into consideration this difference, I recalculated my economy as: miles x 1.06 / total gal used. With only 2 full tanks since the tire change, the average is weak due to lack of data points; 12.75mpg, down from 16.5 before the tire change= difference of -3.75 mpg. Factor in a tiny bit more city driving than the baseline, call it 3.
I was lucky in that the previous owner did not reset the overhead trip computer in a reeeeally long time, so according to that it got 16.6MPG average over 800+ gal used. My pump side calculations were 16.5, so I believe it. Is it perfect? NOPE! But close enough for non-government work.
I am really hoping that the tune up will help; the plugs were OOOOOLD! We should have results from the engine analyzer later this week. This is the fancy way of looking for sparks in the dark like I did every time I went camping in pitch dark, but it also measures the fuel pulse timing vs. spark vs... how many squares I used to wipe this morning, so... ummm everything I think. haha
OK, Stroverlander- I saw the van at the shop yesterday and COMPLETELY spaced on looking at the door sticker!
Based on my Jeep experience, I tend to believe that its very likely to have the lower gear ratio. The distributor is being replaced regardless of scope outcome. I doubt the P.O did it so it likely has the full 216K miles on it.
Great discussions, love it here!