Nitro Budget Expedition Overland

nitro-gear

Supporting Sponsor - Differential & Axle Parts
A Ford Expedition as an “Overlander”? That is the question at hand, why choose this particular truck compared to a Land Cruiser or other well know overland adventuring rig?


Let’s start with the layout. Full frame chassis, torsion bar front suspension, coil sprung rear suspension, full time/part-time transfer case with locking low range, 4 speed auto trans, overhead cam V8 engine and a 30+gallon fuel tank stock. Sound familiar? It’s very much the same combination as a 100 series Land Cruiser, but at a fraction of the cost and that’s where this build comes from. Low buck. The goal is to put together a competent exploring vehicle for checking out the great expanses of the American West for somewhere between $5-10K outfitted for camping and capable of being a daily driver at the same time.


To pencil it further, this particular 2001 Expedition cost $2600.00 when purchased last fall. It had 145,000 miles on the clock. A comparable 2001 Land Cruiser would have run 15-20K at similar mileage. Now please understand we are aware that an Expedition is not a Land Cruiser either in potential reliability or resale value, but it offers good performance for the money and an option when budget simply is not 20-30K for a back country toy. Beyond that there is a Ford dealer in every small town across America and tons of these rigs in wrecking yards so parts are both cheap and plentiful.


The plan for this one started with the need to rebuild the front diff as the pinion bearings had become noisy. Naturally that was a perfect time to swap Nitro 4.56 gears into both the 8.8 front end and the 9.75″ rear axle. Both axles are quite large for the engine output and with the new gears offer reliability and good strength for this application. We may add limited slip diffs at some point as well, but wanted to see how the performance was with open diffs initially and with our budget in mind kept the OE carriers during the install.


DYMLRq0l.jpg



3H4TG7Gl.jpg



N5mdm9pl.jpg



We also considered adding a lift kit for larger tires, but very few exist for this application until you get into a 6+ inch lift range. Way too high for our needs and unnecessary to run the 33″ tall tire we were looking at. Conveniently this truck arrived with helper airbags in the rear coils so a little turn of the front torsion bars and 20psi in the bags netted an extra inch without altering the suspension or significantly changing ride quality. Add in a little trimming of the front bumper and there was enough space to clear the General Grabber AT2 275/70/18 tires mounted on a set of used American Racing wheels we picked up on craigslist for $200.00. We chose these Generals for several reasons. The narrow width (10.9″) and 33.2″ tall size fits nicely in the wheel-wells and helps keep the mud off the side of the rig during off highway excursions. These tires also feature a tread pattern perfectly suited to muddy/snowing northwest dirt roads and are E-rated ensuring plenty of sidewall strength and capacity should we load the rig to the hilt. Finally they are one of the few tires made in the United States and are very competitively priced at about $180.00 each. We had ours mounted at the local Discount Tire and they run nice and smooth working well with the 4.56 Nitro gears.


kIjZ1Xbl.jpg



NY6n04Rl.jpg



Finally for this first stage of the project we took the time to buff the paint on this old truck and give it a quick wax job. No doubt this had not been done in many years (ever?) and the buffer pulled most of the hazing and small scratches out of the finish freshening it up further and looking a lot better with the shiny aluminum wheels and bigger tires.


XEiq7H9l.jpg



StZYEkHl.jpg



KynC7eil.jpg



wBOe7lbl.jpg



The future plans include storage solutions in the back along with fridge/cooler mounting and possibly some stereo upgrades at the same time to integrate a whole package. We also want to look into navigation and a laptop mount along with winch options for self recovery. So far though these initial simple upgrades have made a huge difference in both the way the big SUV drives and the way it looks parked at the curb and we’ve yet to even reach the bottom end of our budget. Given a few more dollars and some time this rig should prove to be a very capable, comfortable weekend rig for exploring and camping.


Costs:


Vehicle Purchase: $2600.00


Nitro 4.56 Gear Package:$899.00


General Grabber AT2 tires (5): $905.00


18 inch wheels (used): $200.00


Mounting and Balancing: $150.00


Current Total: 4754.00


You can also follow along with the build on our blog, check it out here.
 

kojackJKU

Autism Family Travellers!
Welcome to the early 2000s ford family! My 150 fit 33s with stock suspension and has plenty of gc. I am adding air bags on the rear however.

Great choice on the Expy vs. the LC too!
 

Root Moose

Expedition Leader
Yep, these are great trucks. I cross shopped against the 100 and 200 series myself and ended up with one of these. Who needs ~$20+k sitting around in a third-fourth vehicle that is purpose driven only? Even if I wanted to daily drive it I wouldn't - too far and it'd use the truck up prematurely.

Like you said, it's not the same as a Land Cruiser in terms of build quality but it is plenty "truckie" and has the strength where it counts. Strong frame, decent sized running gear, decent power, etc. The interior is dated but easy to clean, mod, whatever. Modern ICE fixes most "modernity" issues. Plenty of space inside and comfortable - coming from a ridiculously overbuilt Jeep Cherokee I can't overstate how great the comfort level is in comparison.

FWIW, I'm running 305/65-18s with the stock 3.55 gears and the 5.4 V8. I'll need to regear at some point. It gets by in the meantime but 33+ tires definitely needs more gear. I'm waffling between 3.73 and 4.10s for mine.
 

ExplorerTom

Explorer
Love. This. Build.

(See my signature)

I've tossed around the idea of 35s for mine. The truck has 32s on it now, but I feel 35s would be best for the terrain around here. I would definitely get 4.56s if I went with 35s. But I also have my Explorer to fund

I'll probably crack the 200k mark in less than 12 months. There's no rust on mine, except for the rear trailing links that are common to rust, and the engine seems pretty healthy. I'm pretty confident in mine lasting another several years.
 

nitro-gear

Supporting Sponsor - Differential & Axle Parts
The Expedition was all loaded up and ready for a road trip down to Moab for EJS:


HtEzXL9l.jpg



TIkt7dll.jpg



On the way down it encountered some transmission issues, so the build is on hold right now until we figure out which direction we will be going to fix it.


Jlzp0Bil.jpg
 

justcuz

Explorer
Thank you for this thread. I feel this platform is way under rated and under used for "overlanding".
I personally have seen lots of these with over 200,000 miles and several with over 300,000 miles.

It is nice to see more cost effective builds being posted by professionals.
You are right, not everyone can afford a Land Cruiser, but need a Land Cruiser sized vehicle for many reasons.

It will be nice to see the finished product...after the transmission is sorted.

Now that you are doing this and the Suburban, you need to add a first generation Sequoia to the stable.
It's another over looked platform. A slightly larger, but great, alternative to a Land Cruiser.
 

Root Moose

Expedition Leader
Yeah, transmissions can be an issue in these. Thankfully, any local shop can work on it.

A couple of guys have done manual transmission swaps. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with mine when the time comes. I like an automatic in a truck but enjoy shifting also.
 

Kmrtnsn

Explorer
Keep an eye on the firewall/floorboards cracking. We had a lot of problems with the Gen I Expeditions running them off-road in the Border Patrol. Once the body starts cracking from flex at the firewall, they're done. We had rows of them lined up, most under 50K miles, all dead-lined and un-serviceable. An engineer from Ford came out looked at them and left, we never heard anything more. Most were replaced with F-250's with slide-in holding boxes and later, Raptors.
 

Root Moose

Expedition Leader
Do you remember if the Border Patrol was using same body style F150s at that time? If so, same body cracking?

Just curious if there is a difference between the firewall/floor stampings between the two platforms or if there is a longitudinal beaming issue for the UN93 trucks specifically.

Can you describe the type of off-road running was typical with these trucks that had the most issues? Realize it was a long time ago, anything you can remember would be appreciated.
 

Kmrtnsn

Explorer
We weren't using the F-150 then. We had a mix of Expeditions, which I preferred and two-door Tahoes, which had their own problems and I hated. I think the problem with the Expeditions was likely the weight of the body unit siting on too few, or too unevenly spaced body mounts coupled with longitudinal flexing of the frame. In "normal" consumer usage I imagine they are fine.
 
Last edited:

Martinjmpr

Wiffleball Batter
, full time/part-time transfer case with locking low range, 4 speed auto trans, overhead cam V8 engine and a 30+gallon fuel tank stock.
.
Sorry, it may seem like a quibble but I'm pretty sure the Expedition doesn't have either one of those things. IIRC the transfer case shifter on the modern Ford, Chevy and Nissan has 4 positions: 2hi, 4hi, 4lo and "automatic 4wd" (my GMT-800 Chevy also has a "neutral" position but I think they may have eliminated that option in the newer versions.) The "automatic 4wd" is not a true full-time 4wd system with a center diff, rather it is a system where the front drive axle remains engaged and then the transfer case can switch between 2hi and 4hi based on rear wheel slippage (presumably using the same sensors as the ABS.) This isn't quite as effective as a true center differential since it requires the rear wheels to slip before it starts sending power to the front axle.
.
I got a nice demonstration of this system back in January when I took a bunch of friends up to Breckenridge and it started snowing heavily on our way home. As we ascended the road to the Eisenhower Tunnel (at an elevation of 11,000') I had the Suburban in Automatic 4wd. We were in stop-and-go traffic due to multiple spinouts up ahead and every time I stopped it seemed the 4wd disengaged, because when I would take my foot off the brake and step on the accelerator to go, I could feel the rear wheels spin and then the front wheels would kick in. After this happened a few times I just put it in 4wd and it was fine.
.
I'm not saying this is a bad system, I actually think it's a good compromise between full time 4wd and part time, but calling it a "full time/part time" transfer case is inaccurate IMO. Without either a center differential or some kind of viscous coupling I don't think you can have a true "full time" 4wd system.
.
As for the fuel tank, according to Edmunds, at least, it's 26 gallons. ;)
.
Having said all that, I like the idea of a low-buck build and I've always thought the 1st gen Expedition would make a good platform just because they are plentiful and inexpensive. It's too bad they went to IRS starting in 2003 because otherwise I would have considered one for myself, but I just prefer the solid rear axle.
 

Root Moose

Expedition Leader
The Expedition has a multi-plate centre differential:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ControlTrac

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_clutch#Multiple_disk_clutches

The jerkiness you sensed may be the energizing from 2WD to AWD mode with a worn centre diff (speculation). Once in AWD/fulltime mode the multi-plate center-diff does it's thing like a normal differential via software.

Part time is just 4HI with the centre multi-plate diff locked of course.

There is something called the "brown wire mod" that locks out the AWD on the later trucks - basically intercepts the current to the centre diff and allows you to put a toggle switch on it. It effectively re-enables the 2WD mode on the early UN93 platform.

It's a good system. I have no qualms about not having a lever in the cab of my truck.
 

ExplorerTom

Explorer
The 4wd gas tanks are supposed to be 30 gallon. When I had my down to replace the fuel pump, it had "30 gal" molded into the plastic of the tank. However I've never pumped more than 27.5 gallons.

The 2wd tanks are 26 or 27 gallon. Not sure why those get smaller tanks.

As far as the jerkiness, try pulling fuse #104 from the underhood fuse box. That solved my issues. Then I did the brown wire mod.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,912
Messages
2,922,095
Members
233,083
Latest member
Off Road Vagabond
Top