Pikeman
Adventurer
For being a small trailer, I think your setup will work fine. Personally I would have put the diagonal a-frame under the chassis for less fatigue on the welds and more material to weld to. If you look at car hauler trailers and the nicer utility trailers, you'll see the tongue is under the main frame/deck. It's usually referred to a "Wrap Around Tongue". Usually these diagonal channel sections go under the frame all the way back near the axle. This increases stability when towing and fights the forces of nature that are pushing down at the two pieces joined together. For example... Take a pencil and break it in half. Now tape the two halves back together and see how little force is required to break at the joint. Now stack one half on top of the other and tape them together and see how much more pressure it takes to break the joint.
Either way, it looks good and should be fine since you're most likely not going to overload the trailer. The only other issue I see is the shock mount gussetts. They'll most likely be fine since shocks only put as much load on the mount as they do when you're stroking them by hand, but if the shock gets bottomed out, it can push that mount down, and the horizontal gussets can shear off due to their design of a straight butt joint in it's weakest plane. If you take this trailer out on trails and it's loaded pretty good, coming off a rock could bottom out the shock and cause the mount to shear right off. I'd add a vertical gusset under each shock mount to increase the shear strength of the mount. It's easy and cheap insurance.
I agree 100% on adding another gusset vertically under the shock mount. I do not entirely agree with you on the tongue. If you look at the major manufacturers of the off-road trailers and tear drops the tongue is on same plane as the frame and part of the frame. Usually by cutting a wedge out and rewelding once bent inwards to make the angle. While the weld now becomes stronger than the metal they have created a weak spot on the side they bent(outer edge). Now look at cargo trailers my other major manufacturers and rental companies. Most trailers with under a 3k rating have just a single square tube that make up the tongue. If this was a trailer designed to carry a few thousand pounds than sure the "Aussie rules" tongue design would make more sense. However if all the revered/ tauted forum sponsors vednors on here that people praise for the best quality feel it adequate for their Off-road trailers to have tongue in plane with their frames then it will be fine on my trailer.
In my tongue the piece that is carrying the vertical load is the reciever tube that is welded and goes through the reinforced front cross member and welded and supported in the rear at the second. The sides of the triangle are for lateral stability and also add a little to the vertical stability. I find it very difficult to believe that making the frame and tongue one solid piece is weaker than smaller size channel held to the frame by 4 bolts underneath. If I had butt welded the entire tongue to the front cross member I would be worried and agree with your Pencil analogy, or if I had poor welds that did not penetrate properly. To take your pencil analogy and apply it properly think of it this way. Hold the pencil by it eraser on the edge of a table and push down on the other end suspended in air. Little to no force(butt welded to front of frame) Now take the same pencil place 1/3 on the table and trap the eraser end(2nd cross member) and at the edge of the table(goes through front cross memeber) and try to push down(my tongue design) wont budge without excessive force.