This guy contacted me regarding setting up his Tundra and a FWC. I adamantly told him it was a bad idea due to where it would sit on a double cab, and how the FWC weigh a fair amount more than their bogus claims.
The guy with the Tundra discussed some of his Instagram posts. He crested a hill and either hit a wash or a bump on the other side. Judging by his other post on IG he likes driving fast off-road. He had added some cross members and did box the frame. With the bigger camper on the short bed truck it created a nice lever. He claims that his upgrades to the frame gave him an additional 2,800 lbs over stock GVWR ?Is there a link to more info about that Tundra frame failure? I don't feel so stupid now about making a flex mount for mine...
The guy with the Tundra discussed some of his Instagram posts. He crested a hill and either hit a wash or a bump on the other side. Judging by his other post on IG he likes driving fast off-road. He had added some cross members and did box the frame. With the bigger camper on the short bed truck it created a nice lever. He claims that his upgrades to the frame gave him an additional 2,800 lbs over stock GVWR ?
Sounds like his insurance covered him and he's already found another tundra to swap all his parts and camper to ?
He had added some cross members and did box the frame.
I have a 2015 Ram 3500 with an Alumline aluminum flatbed that supports a 2000 pd Bundutec Odyssey. 80,000 + miles, many of them offroad. The only suspension upgrades are upgraded shocks and springs in the front (Fox and Carli) and in the rear, leaf springs were rearched, added a leaf and upgraded the shocks. I am right at GVRW fully loaded. The truck handles that weight with no problems and handles well on and off road.
I considered going to a 4500 or 5500 but in many ways, they are more complex (switching out dualies for Super singles, etc) and I don't see what advantage that has. If I was hauling a heavier camper maybe.
I looked at his IG photos and didn't see anything interesting...
Every time I've seen a Tundra frame boxed it's only the rear part. In other words he reinforced the part that was already made rock solid by the flatbed, and probably made the transition between that and the middle part of the frame even more abrupt. The part (and the only part) that might benefit from reinforcement would the transition area... and that would be adding extra plates to the 3 sides of the frame rail, not boxing it.
Your assessment is spot on. The highest stress point when you hard mount a stiff flatbed to a frame that is made to flex is at the forward mount. On a Tundra the frame rather quickly "transitions" from thick and tall closed C to thin and short open C right at the forward leaf mount. In this configuration those two will coincide. Add in a camper CG that is well aft of the axle, and this isn't surprising.
I have the Hemi and not the diesel. I checked the frame 6 months or so ago and saw no evidence of any issues. When the flat bed was installed, they commented that flatbed installs on the diesel trucks always carried more risk. I assumed either the frames are different or the extra weight of the diesel engine were the issues.When was the last time you did a close inspection of your frame rails under the truck close to the cab?
I wouldnt say there alot, but there are several on the Cummins forum that have reported, and posted pics of their frames cracking after hard mounting flatbeds and campers
My C&C 5500 is the exact opposite and its boxed forward of the cab and open C channel behind the cab.
I would push you to Thuren or Carli though. The AEV is a lift in appearance only. It does not really increase performance.
....you will want some give in the flatbed attachment or there is some risk of cracking the frame.