Jkfisher84
Adventurer
Looking for opinions and or facts on which is better. I have a Ram right now but been kinda iffy on the idea compared to the prefilter. Just looking for an overall pro/con. For a 10' JKU
do you live in a dust bowl?
if not, it is not really worth a prefilter. IMO
I run the pre-filter since most of the trails around me and even up north a little are very dusty, and since I normally dont go alone I am typically in the back eating dust. Now I dont worry and the peace of mind is nice too. As for looks I like the ram better.
View attachment 169554
This! High Sierra trails get really dusty in Summer. And 3rd or 4th, or farther back in line makes it pretty nasty for the air filter. Any help is worth it IMO. I plan on running the pre-filter when I get my AEV snorkel. Just wish they would've left the old design alone; I liked the clear bowl so you could see what it was catching. The new design is solid and is a maintenance free design -- stuff just falls through so you never really know what it caught, except that it doesn't show up on the filter. Also don't like that they made it where you have to buy both to get the pre-filter on the gen. 2. Kind of a double whammy to raise the price and then force you to buy a ram that you'll never use.I run the pre-filter since most of the trails around me and even up north a little are very dusty, and since I normally dont go alone I am typically in the back eating dust. Now I dont worry and the peace of mind is nice too. As for looks I like the ram better.
View attachment 169554
I've been wanting to get a pre-filter for my RR XHD snorkel as well. I still plan on running the ram while daily driving and only switching to the bowl when conditions warrant it unless I don't notice any performance difference. My hold up is trying to find reliable CFM data for the 3.6L to pick the right bowl; I've only managed to find the 3.8L flow requirements.