The OP's 2018 Tacoma has a 2GR-FKS (the 3.5L V6), which is a direct injection on-demand Atkinson cycle engine. So absolutely a relevant post by @ITTOG.The DI units are a different ball game. Many would benefit from a high detergent diesel oil to keep the intakes clean. The soot accumulation in the intake a bit different than the combustion chamber carbon buildup seen on older carb and early FI engines used at low loads.
Are there any DI gasoline engines used in the light and medium trucks? I am not an avid truck guy, so no idea.
Idling motors tend to run HOT not COLD. That is why over the years, you could see commercial and civil service vehicles with the hoods open that were being idled for extended periods of time. It's not necessary for the most part anymore because most modern vehicles have more robust (larger multirow radiators), well ducted (shrouded) radiator cooling systems, and electric fans which can pull in the air effectively whether or not the vehicle's moving forward.No motor likes to idle for long periods of time. Typicaly that creates running too cold what creates moisture and unburned fuel accumulation.
But mixed into the overall vehicle lifespan, a few hours steady idling on your stated rare occasion, Wont hurt anything.
I see no reason for there to be any carbon buildup on the intake manifold on a direct injected motor. A direct injected motor is just that. The fuel (the carbon source) bypasses the induction system and is injected directly into the cylinder under high pressure. The only thing that goes through the intake manifold is air. BTW, you would need to have a significantly leaky intake valve that was burping hot exhaust back into the intake manifold and that would only affect that cylinder, at which time you would have a larger problem than carbon buildup on the intake manifold...A modern gasoline engine does not get carbon buildup.
oh yeah the do, well at least the direct injection ones surely do with no fuel to clean the valve-train and an EGR.. Ive got a gas direct injection thats on its 2nd intake manifold, it has 50k on it and was driven gingerly/lightly most of its life.. now its my work beater and I WOT it every chance I get so I dont have to put a 3rd one on before I get rid of it.
diesel or gas dont matter, its the DI and EGR that will build up a ton of carbon if its not given an Italian tune up regularly.

Can you provide some links of the supposed intake manifold carbon issues...? if there is truly carbon in the intake manifold, something else is wrong...Dreadlocks is correct. There is an industry built around pecan shell blasting intakes and heads due to carbon build up. I just saw pictures of a 2017 f150 3.5 EcoBoost with about 20000 miles that looked like it had 300,000 miles.

I will look for the link but it was in the f150ecoboost.net forums.Can you provide some links of the supposed intake manifold carbon issues...? if there is truly carbon in the intake manifold, something else is wrong...Dreadlocks is correct. There is an industry built around pecan shell blasting intakes and heads due to carbon build up. I just saw pictures of a 2017 f150 3.5 EcoBoost with about 20000 miles that looked like it had 300,000 miles.
Regards,
RestorationRides
Sent from my REVVLPLUS C3701A using Tapatalk
Thanks for the link.go read up on the EGR that is required emissions controll device, thats the source of carbon.. mine was replaced under warranty so they just put a new manifold on since the variable vanes stoped being operational.. there's a service bulletin for it because its so common.
Generic Article: https://brentuning.com/?news=the-importance-of-carbon-cleaning-your-direct-inject-engine
delete the EGR and/or reprogram it so its never used and the problem goes away with DI engines.. in our case it was likely exasperated by the fact the vehicle was just used for short trips to the store, since EGR is basically 100% duty to warm up the engine it clogged er up fast.
now I seafoam spray it through the intake from time to time after giving it a good beating and hope for the best.
back to the OP, I tried this on my last setup and it didnt work out all that great.. was never willing to idle it long enough to get SLA battery back up to 100%, was abusing batteries and they simply never lasted long.. so this time around I got a small generator that I can run as much as needed, even if we are away from camp fishing/hiking/wheeling.
