Show Your Ironic Photos
- Thread starter articulate
- Start date
Overland Hadley
on a journey
He made me do it! It's not my fault!:sombrero:
.
That is the airlines that kicked a lady off the plane because of how she was dressed, (her skirt was to short and her shirt was too small). Now they have a lady in a bikini plastered across the whole plane.
Now that is ironic
Ursidae69
Expedition Leader
Thanks for the explanation. The irony was lost on me before you posted this explanation.
7wt: Love the flaming truck. ********... :coffeedrink:
S
Scenic WonderRunner
Guest
7wt.....
Why don't you show us....."Your" Ironic Photos?
I would love to see them!
.
Why don't you show us....."Your" Ironic Photos?
I would love to see them!
.
7wt
Expedition Leader
The best ones I had were purged from my computer in a fit of cleaning out storage space. I had a few that were really good. Looking at the title of the thread, I guess I should have posted "my" pics and not just funny pics. Mea culpa.
FourByLand
Expedition Leader
HAHA, I think 7wt has it down!
TeamReader
New member
Optimistic?? you be the judge
Abel Villesca
Explorer
Whoa! I feel for the owner, but that is hilariously ironic.
Pskhaat
2005 Expedition Trophy Champion
Not a picture, but A) not wanting to start another irony thread and B) just saw mcvickoffroad's signature line:
Read as monotony with implications of boredom? First let me say I eagerly seek said monotony. I yearn to be bored. It is not choice but boredom, that which saves us from work and toil, which is the essence of life. For why else would there be work?
Anyway, if monotony is effectively the same thing in repetition ad nauseum, does it stand to reason that it can be compared? To itself? The question is, did Phillips write it with that in mind, or just blind recursion?
Wendell Phillips said:
Read as monotony with implications of boredom? First let me say I eagerly seek said monotony. I yearn to be bored. It is not choice but boredom, that which saves us from work and toil, which is the essence of life. For why else would there be work?
Anyway, if monotony is effectively the same thing in repetition ad nauseum, does it stand to reason that it can be compared? To itself? The question is, did Phillips write it with that in mind, or just blind recursion?
Last edited:
Pskhaat
2005 Expedition Trophy Champion
I failed English and literature in 9th grade. Flat out failed. Please school me here:
Not wanting to get into the contest between posters earlier, but does not irony imply somewhat of a keen knowledge of context of the irony? I love the following pics, but is the first not simply coincidence and not irony?
The second pic seems to be complete incompetence in proper wording and order as there is no underlying understanding of the meaning by whomever made the sign?..or is it because there was a bar written in there?
Oh yeah, and 1 more thing about the bird pic, that's photcopped right? The matching line curves are WAY to similar and the real bird appears far too antialiased onto the sky?
Not wanting to get into the contest between posters earlier, but does not irony imply somewhat of a keen knowledge of context of the irony? I love the following pics, but is the first not simply coincidence and not irony?
The second pic seems to be complete incompetence in proper wording and order as there is no underlying understanding of the meaning by whomever made the sign?..or is it because there was a bar written in there?
Oh yeah, and 1 more thing about the bird pic, that's photcopped right? The matching line curves are WAY to similar and the real bird appears far too antialiased onto the sky?
Last edited:
I remember those pictures kcowyo....
Here is my addition to this thread.
Me in 2003 in Aspen:
Sorry, I'm just not seeing the irony in this photo!?
mountainpete
Spamicus Eliminatus
Found this one on the web today:
