Hi All,
I have been wanting to answer Henry's post, but am running around like a crazy person trying desperately to get a zillion things done for a big donor trip to Denver and then immediately thereafter a month in Kenya and TZ. So forgive if this is a bit hasty! (And THANK YOU everybody who already pretty much said what needs to be said.
HenryJ said:
Has anyone tried one of these lights first? Are they sturdy? Do they actually work well? Do they last? Do these people actually want them?
I think you forgot to perhaps read up on the BoGoLight.com website first, and then also the reviews posted by DesertDouglas. They are extremely well researched and the idea for them came from a NEED identified by someone who has 40 years experience in Africa. I think that qualifies.
HenryJ said:
Are you just sending a bunch of plastic to be disposed of in a foreign country?
I can't speak to that directly without sounding skeptical back! A lot of folks in the West seem to want to keep the rest of world without the very same conveniences as we enjoy . . . why? Why shouldn't they have rechargeable plastic flashlights when all they have now is kerosene or candles? And they or their children die of lung-related illnesses from inhaling all the particulates in tiny mud huts? The statistics are there. The need is there.
Every time we go to African countries we're asked for our flashlights because they don't have the money - or are even remotely close to a "store" - for batteries. They just beg lights from tourists, then toss them out when they're dead and beg for more.
Can you imagine how hazardous it is to walk at night in regions where there are deadliest snakes in the world? More people die of snakebite in African then many of the "scary" diseases everybody worries about.
HenryJ said:
I know it is easier to get someone to donate when there is "something in it for them". You get a light and feel better since it was a donation to someone else. The light arrives and it is a $4 piece of junk. You still feel OK, since you contributed to a good cause. Would the money have been better spent sending it directly the the people who need it to buy solar panels to provide power for a school?
We have seen the lights, they're great. They will be welll-received.
Would the money have been better spent on something else?
Gosh, you could say that about ANYTHING!
Would I rather have $100 cash than the lights?
Of course.
I'd also rather be fundraising than writing this right now!
But you could talk yourself out of ANYTHING with this kind of logic.
Here's where we're coming from:
someone has a great program to fill a big need (if you haven't travelled in the Third World and really gotten out there and visited with real people, you can't fathom the needs . . .).
We are supporting it because sometimes it is just one small deed, one small step, one person at a time to change the world.
If all I ever thought about was "oh I'm not going to do this because helping one person read at night / not step on a puff adder / not get lunch disease because I'd rather help 500 or 500,000 people" then I'd never do anything.
And I'd just sit on my rear like most of the rest of the world and get fatter in the First World.
Sorry I'm sounding snarky! I just really feel passionately that to change the world it starts with small things, and with people with heart.
We should not criticize these people til we first read up on what they are doing and then talk to them directly (that's what I did with Mark Bent and this project - before I supported it, or wrote anything about it).
Well, I must get back to work.
Oh, and by the way if you'd read the website, you'd see their next project is a cheap solar powered water purifier. Dirty water is a huge cause of massive infectious disease spread in Africa.