Tall skinny tires on a 5th gen TE 4Runner?

[huntsonora]

I have looked and looked and haven't found any 5th gen 4Runners running tall skinny tires.

I like the look of the 285's but I like the performance of the skinnier tires. I am thinking about going with a set of 235/80/17's on my trail edition. Does anybody run these and what are your thoughts. They are 32" tall by about 9.5" wide and weigh just a little more than the stock tires that come on it

 

[huntsonora]

235's vs 265's

 

[Scott Brady]

Is your truck stock? I like the 255/80 R17 on the 4Runner with a slight lift.

 

[huntsonora]

It's stock right now. I've always liked the 255's as well but it seems like a better selection of tires with the 235's

 

[AFSOC]

Is your truck stock? I like the 255/80 R17 on the 4Runner with a slight lift.

huntsonora,
The 255/80 R17 may appear to be an intriguing size but manufacturer, model choices and availability are very limited in that size. Finding off the rack stock in an out of the way shop, in the middle of a trip, when you need it may be a challenge.

 

[Desert Dan]

255x75x17"
GY MTRs fit on a 4th Gen fine

80 series sound interesting

Are those pictures Hankook Dyna Pro tires?

 

[huntsonora]

Yes sir, these are the Hankooks. I took the picture just for reference, I haven't decided on a tire yet but the Hankooks are in the running. I also like Cooper Discoverer S/T's and Goodyear Duratracs.

One of the benefits of the 235's is that they are used on duallys and there are a ton of options. They are a little taller and a little narrower than the 265's and weigh 5lbs less per tire on average. The Goodyear Duratracs only weigh 46 lbs which isn't bad for a load range E tire

 

[oldblue]

I ran LT255/75 R17 (32.1" diameter) on my '11 with no lift on FJ wheels (a bit more offset).

I liked them for the application and had no rubbing whatsoever.

 

[p nut]

I don't have any experiences with those exact sizes, but I have run 235/85/16's. Basically, I did not like them. On and off-road performance was poor. They just had no lateral grip. When turning, steering felt mushy and there was a lot more tire squeal than with previous 265's. Off-camber trails off-road weren't confidence inspiring, either.

Theoretically, they should get better MPG, but not in my experience. I would go with at least 255's or stick with 265/70/17's.

 

[SEP]

Hi here are some pics of a 255/80/17 on my 5th Gen. I like it coz it looks stock but taller.

 

[DanKunz]

Here in the SE skinny tires seem to have issues on slick muddy rocks and I have seen many beads blown. The wider contact on a 285 or the like prevents that at lower pressure and does perform better. Just something to think about depending on how you use it.

 

[ScottyDog]

My brother runs the 255 80 17 attached to FJ steel wheels on his 5th Gen also. We like the way it looks and it rides good and handles well offroad. Sorry for the crappy cell pics..

 

[huntsonora]

SEP and Scottydog, do those 4runners have lifts?

 

[ScottyDog]

SEP and Scottydog, do those 4runners have lifts?

Yes, my brother is running ICON 2.5" or 3" lift. Sorry don't know all the details off hand.

 

[montypower]

I'm very happy with 235s! 235/85/16 Firestone Destination MT - 48lbs - 3 Ply Sidewall - Load E - Measure true 32"

My lifetime MPG average since new on the Taco (over 11,000 miles) is 17mpg. That includes all off road adventures (non-adjusted so add 3% for actual) - been on 10 trips since Dec. Best MPG = 21 (as you see it fully modified). No need to regear it happily stays in OD on the hwy. Brake performance is still very good. Move up to 255s and you'll be wanting gears, bigger brakes and wishing for better MPG.

Works great in deep snow @ 5psi. Excellent wet pavement traction. Holds the road very well. There is no issue with corning grip or lateral stability - I'm sure this varies tire to tire when going skinny.

ATTACH=CONFIG]165751[/ATTACH]