Not necessarily... not if you adjust to the proper pressure. This is the video that found the skinny to be much more compliant. Same load rating for both. But ya, if it's a choice between tires of the same dimensions, then the one with thinner and more compliant sidewalls should ride better.Just be cautious that 285/75r18s are pretty much all load index 129, that means they are very very stiff,
You stuck on using 18's - you don't indicate if alternate wheel size is an option.Probably getting a new Tundra with 18" wheels. 275 70 18 seems like a decent 33" size without stepping up to 285. Any all terrain or hybrid tires in 275 that's are taller? I'd like to keep the 18s.
Not necessarily... not if you adjust to the proper pressure. This is the video that found the skinny to be much more compliant. Same load rating for both. But ya, if it's a choice between tires of the same dimensions, then the one with thinner and more compliant sidewalls should ride better.
I'd really like people to replicate this test with different tires... because I don't understand why they'd be so different.
Well... that's confusing since you are the 2nd person to say that. In the video I posted above, he found that the skinny tires flexed much better than the wide ones... it wasn't close. And most of us are using E rated tires anyway, since in the big sizes that is most common. Just sayin', a skinny E should ride better than a fat E.Otherwise I've never seen pizza cutters in anything other than E load rating.... which is AWFUL, and not worth the harsh ride/lack of flex.
So... what size are the KO2s and what psi do you use for those?I had Yoko X-AT and Falken At3w, both 285/75r18s
I'd run up to 60psi when towing heavy, and normal day to day I'd run 36psi, it wasn't bad but compare to the KO2s in c-load, it was like riding on BRICKS vs cloud. I think pizza cutters have their place, lighter vehicles and duallys, not a Tundra.