No one thinks it was the final version. But the very construction of thick steel - extra strong steel on the outside being the load carrying part of this thing was surely the point of this exercise, no?
So, unless they do a complete redesign where there is no such "exoskeleton" carrying all the forces and being unforgiving, it will be just as dangerous. They can change it, obviously, but they have to give up on all their notions, except, perhaps, the "bulletproof" glass. They can probably get away with that. The rest of the "engineering" behind this makes it dangerous to both the occupants and anyone they hit.
If they do a redesign from the ground up and construct the thing like their other offerings, is it still the Cybertruck? They will have to do this to make it safe: A safety cell to protect against intrusions surrounded by crumple zones. That's how physics work. And "tech" won't take away the physics of a crash or being hit by this thing.
So, unless they do a complete redesign where there is no such "exoskeleton" carrying all the forces and being unforgiving, it will be just as dangerous. They can change it, obviously, but they have to give up on all their notions, except, perhaps, the "bulletproof" glass. They can probably get away with that. The rest of the "engineering" behind this makes it dangerous to both the occupants and anyone they hit.
If they do a redesign from the ground up and construct the thing like their other offerings, is it still the Cybertruck? They will have to do this to make it safe: A safety cell to protect against intrusions surrounded by crumple zones. That's how physics work. And "tech" won't take away the physics of a crash or being hit by this thing.