Before my wife went back to school she was commuting 2 miles each way in a '90 Civic. I think I only gassed that thing up 5 or 6 times a year. Of course around the same time I was putting 35-40k on my '94 pickup. I loved that truck...
ha ha!
Ever notice the most AEV pics have the tow mirrors folded out....c'mon guys! .
Still ************ vehicle. If I were planning out my dream hunting rig, it would be very close to what is pictured there.
Meh. An overland snorkel can make sense depending on the context. As I understand it, it was primarily developed to raise the air intake above road dust/dirt kicked up during convoy travel in backcountry areas....the secondary purpose was to raise the air intake for water crossings...though as others have pointed out, you have to make sure other parts of the vehicle have been sealed or moved appropriately or else the snorkel is a moot point. Though diesels are no more susceptible to water issues than gasoline...it's really the electronics, fuel cap, intake, ect. that you need to worry about for water crossings.
I see a snorkel on a Truck out in Utah, or in the outback of Australia, I'd say that makes sense.
As for the price on that AEV Ram...yeah..EXPENSIVE AS S%*T! I think I'd buy a used Ram, with the 5.9L Cummins, and simply do the work myself....still would cost a bit, but much more cost-effective than buying a 2013+ and having AEV do all the work.
I just put new brake pads, four Bilsteins and a new steering dampener on my '97 T100 for about the same cost as a set of floor mats and tie downs on a new Tacoma. In the near future, I'll be needing a timing belt and new front axles, and I'd really like to find some new seats. That should cost less than the sales tax on a new Tacoma!
It kinda makes sense then it doesn't if you look at Baja racers, they don't use snorkels. I lived in AZ for 20 years, and have been going to
down to Baja just as long...in a convoy, it is dusty no matter where the air intake is. Usually you back off, and/or drive staggered and hope for a breeze.
Baja racing and overlanding are 2 different activities with different sets of priorities...do we even need to mention how often those Baja vehicles get rebuilt or have significant repairs done due to the wear/tear/abuse?
Also, I'm sure a big giant intake would be absolutely wonderful for the aerodynamics of those Baja vehicles..:bike_rider:...last time I checked, most overlanders or offroaders aren't worried about their finish times. So I'm sure in the risk vs reward analysis, most Baja racers would rather have less drag over a higher air intake.
Just because you personally don't use a snorkel, doesn't mean that they don't serve a functional purpose. If you do even a modest amount of google searching, you can find some test results done by outfitters and overlanders in Australia and South Africa.
All that being said, I acknowledge that there are probably some people who have snorkels purely for show.
Chase trucks for the most part don't run snorkels.
Snorkels for sure serve a function in particular applications, as you said....(like most things)...the average offroader/overlander doesn't really need it. More for show than anything...lets see how much unnecessary crap we can bolt on a vehicle. It is a fashion accessary more than anything. These trends come and go. Majority of people would be better served by keeping their vehicle stock...but stock isn't cool... I mean, geezzz...look at all the build threads...