Yeah, exactly.
Having the loads concentrated on the far ends of the load bearing portion of the frame introduces some big challenges. I wish I had a suggestion. In retrospect would you consider moving the pivot closer to the axle?
I think the pivot frame design was OK if we'd had a load matched to the physics of how far out we were extending the loads, as you rightly point out. In my view, there are two basic challenges with our particular implementation of the concept.
First, and by far the biggest single issue, is that we just put too much weight on this size truck. If we were going to go out with this much weight we should have built on a bigger truck. This was simply ignorance, as I knew basically zero about all of this prior to starting and had literally weeks to research and pick a solution.
God forbid we should take less stuff.
Seriously though, after living in the rig full time for 18 months, I would still make almost all the same choices on what to bring along, I'd just build it on a truck better suited to the weight we are dragging around.
Second, and this is related only to the Fuso FG, the frame tapers starting forward of the rear axle back to the tail. Obviously, many others have built excellent expedition rigs on this platform with great success. They were less gluttonous in their appetite for stuff to drag along.
With 20/20 hindsight, we should have either a) brought less stuff (horrors! :Wow1
![Smile :) :)]()
, b) built on a bigger chassis, or c) reinforced the frame to match our load, which is what we will now attempt to accomplish.