The last roll of Kodachrome

SunTzuNephew

Explorer
I never really liked Kodachrome - too saturated. I shot Ektachrome, mostly. Or Illford HP.

But frankly, I'm surprised anyone is still using film. I love digital. And I don't use photoshop.
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
We had an Relic Run attendee shooting old 35mm Kodachrome, I'm really excited to see how it turned out (Charles you reading this :D).

Is this a process another film company can reproduce or something very proprietary to Kodak?
 

4xdog

Explorer
I loved Kodachrome. Shot a lot of Ektachrome, too, but the warmth of Kodachrome was my favorite. 40 years on, the old slides are still preferable to what I'm getting now. Kodak made a great product. I'd love to have a "Kodachrome" setting on my digital camera today!
 

aires35

Adventurer
Being a huge history fan, I really appreciate this post. My youngest son, has never had to have a picture of him be developed! Thanks again.
 

Wander

Expedition Leader
IIRC the Kodachrome process is time intensive (i.e. expensive) and not exactly envrio friendly due to the chemicals but I think it's the cost and lack of film sales that caused Kodak to stop production.

I've got a box of slides from about 20 years ago that still look incredible.

Anyone try Fujichrome-is it close?

In the story about the last roll it mentioned he shot that roll in many locations around the globe-I wonder how he protected the film from the airport security and their fiendish ways. I'm guessing the roll had to stay in the body of the camera the whole time.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
190,062
Messages
2,923,631
Members
233,330
Latest member
flipstick
Top