does it need a hub-centric spacer?
I was a car guy, back in the day, old-school throw it together and run what you brung. Nobody I knew matched hubs to wheels on our cars, and nobody ever lost a wheel. Not even in 9-10 second 1/4 mile racing. As long as the wheel studs were up to spec, and the (my hidden, flat,no lugs) wheel spacer went unnoticed in the tech inspection, we were good up to 9 flat. Going further back, I was like thousands of others, who ran with Cragar SS multi-fit wheels, made to fit on all 5-stud hubs, from 4.5" to 5" bolt pattern. Use the offset washer, center the wheel, torque 'em down, and run.

Since those wheels were meant to fit many brands of cars, the hub center size wasn't a factor. And when I went to using racing specific wheels (Weld, Centerline, Cragar Quick-Trick), they were lug-centric as well. Only thing I ever made sure of, was that the lug studs were strong enough, in good shape, torqued properly, and the lug nut design matched the wheel (conical for some, flat with washer for others.

On my first trailer axle, I replaced the original 4-lug hub (8" tire) with a 5-lug (stub & bearing & hub assembly) to go to a 14" tire. I added two 1.25" spacer/adapters to clear the frame rails, and torqued/loctited the spacers to the hubs. I must've put 1k miles on the trailer, always checking lug nut torque (between trips), and had no problems with lug-centricity. With my new 3500 lb axle, I didn't need the spacers, and the wheels are still not needing a hub-centric spacer. It's up to the operator whether or not to trust either system, but, I feel that the hub-centricity movement has come from those that drift-race their cars, putting excess side loading on the wheels that other users may not ever do to theirs. Anyway, here's one maker of hub-centric spacers :
