kcowyo
ExPo Original
expeditionswest said:The GS is low and comfortable, while the KTM is (really) tall and the seat would get anyone at Gitmo to talk.
:xxrotflma
Nice comparo. Glad the trip concluded safely - :campfire:
expeditionswest said:The GS is low and comfortable, while the KTM is (really) tall and the seat would get anyone at Gitmo to talk.
goodtimes said:I would agree with that statement. The suspension is the major limiting factor on the 650GS....you just cannot get around the lack of suspension travel (about 60% of the travel that the KTM has). We are going to try to push the BMW suspension to the realistic and practical limits in the future (meaning we are going to retain the damping rod forks, but tune spring rates and compression/rebound damping on both ends), but there is only so much you can do with 5" of travel.
For tall riders with a decent amount of experience, the 950 is a great bike. For us not so tall riders (Tim Hilslammer aside...), it would be a handful on this trail.
The 950 adventure is definately a "Scotty" bike. :sombrero:
LandCruiserPhil said:Curious on why you went with a 650GS and not a Dakar? Sounds like the Dakar would have been better suited for your needs with 25% more travel and 40% more ground clearance.