saltamontes
Observer
OutbacKamper said:As the owner of a NL camper (which is consistently rated higher for quality than BF) I can tell you that there is very little difference in build quality. The 2 piece fiberglass "clamshell" is great but everything else is the same "stick and staple" quality. My camper has the same aluminum frame and glass windows as most other campers. There are only a few of the newest models that are available with dometic/sietz windows. All the hardware, fittings, appliances, etc are the same quality as any other camper I have seen or owned. The plastic fittings on the exterior deteriorate in sunlight just like any other camper. It may have a 2 piece fg shell, but that shell has lots of penetrations for fasteners, doors, windows, jack brackets, etc and these are prone to leakage just like any other camper.
In summary the 2 piece FG design is better, but the build quality and materials used is/are not.
Cheers
Mark
i suppose i should qualify "stick and staple" construction as first that applied to the interior casework and second as applied to the shell construction.
true, the interior of nearly every camper is glued/stapled laminate and plywood. They do this both for cost and for weight. I would rather see upgrade options to solid wood, composites, marble, etc.. but they mass manufacture this stuff so customization suffers. Regarding the weight savings, i have no problem whatsoever and applaud NorthernLite for their weight conscientiousness, something increasingly ignored by manufacturers. I think anyone considering building from scratch should consider the weight penalties of outfitting the interior like earthroamer and should make sure they are w/in the stated capacities of the carrying vehicle. Probably be cheaper and easier to upgrade a few interior components rather than build from scratch, yes?
the clamshell construction of NLite and BF, while having the same roof penetrations, benefits from not having the seams and every corner of the camper. IMO, this is a major benefit in terms of both structural integrity and weather tightness. Natcoa.org has some pictures of various shell cross-sections and if all that were available were "stick and staple" shells, i too would be looking to build instead of buy. I own a NLite camper also and if there is any consideration for buying vs. building i assume the purchase would be a newer model many of which come stock w/ Dometic windows if that were a major decision factor.
apologies for hijacking this thread w/ Chicken Little talk.. but my understanding is that the new Dodges sold today expressly state that they are not rated for campers (its a note in the glovebox or something). "Quality Construction" usually means "Heavy Construction" so keep that in mind before we jump all over the TC manufacturers for "Low Quality", lets factor weight into the equation (esp if one intends to carry it on a domestic, full-size SRW truck).
Additionally, considering you are looking at a LWB (CrewCab?) truck, is this rig meant to really boonie-bash? Because the breakover and weight (potentially) will limit its off-road capabilities.
Most campers on the road today are overloading the truck carrying them. This puts all of us sharing those roads at risk. Additionally, in the event of tire/axle/wheel; truck failure (and God forbid injuries) your ins co may deny coverage, exposing yourself to potentially serious liabilities. There is a reason why TurtleV and earthroamer are on a F550 chassis.
I think we all would opt for Charlie Aaron's unimog as the ultimate expo vehicle if $ was no object. Unfortunately, i want to expo today and i have not the time to build from scratch. I suppose this site is all about the custom build.. but my advice is maybe buy a cheap used TC you can expo today while you fine-tune your requirements for the ultimate custom build.
i will now duck behind this chicken wire as y'all start chucking empty beer cans at the killjoy.