TreeTopFlyer
Adventurer
That bolt head is what worries me. But hey the straps at least look cool.
To each his own as far as a diesel. To me, and where I live, it's a no-brainer. Gas stations are few and far between - exactly a week ago I took a photo of my rig beneath a sign warning the next fuel was 111 miles. In every rig I own I keep a log book in which everything is written down, oil changes, wiper blade changes, fuel fillups, etc. So the following mileage figures are averages calculated over 5,000 miles. Up until two years ago I had a Ford with the 460/5 speed manual. It got 12 mpg. I now have a 2007 E-350 with the V-10 and 5 speed automatic. It averages 12.1 mpg. My pickup (Cummins/Ram) averages 18.8 mpg. So, considering I will use 30 gallons before needing to fill up:
12.1 mpg X 30 gallons = 363 miles
18.8 mpg X 30 gallons = 564 miles
That to me, my friend, is a significant figure. Two hundred miles further on a tank of fuel means I plan trips differently depending on whether I'm in the diesel or the gas rig. Out here, any remote ranch will have diesel if you get in a bind. None will carry gasoline.
To carry that further, let's look at the price difference to drive 1,000 miles at current prices in my area:
@ 12.1 mpg = 82.6 gallons @ $3.08/gallon = $255
@ 18.8 mpg = 53.2 gallons @ $3.18/gallon = $169
So I'm saving nearly a hundred dollars in fuel costs every time I put on 1000 miles. And that's at today's prices. Until recently, and for the last 5 months, diesel was running up to 20 cents a gallon cheaper than gas here.
But I don't want to hijack this thread. If something like the above pickup is your thing, go for it! It's just not practical for me. All I was trying to say was that if Chrysler was looking to increase sales (and they'd better be, looking at the latest financial figures compared to the other auto makers), they need to offer more of what people are asking for. And more engine choices is one of those things.
Even a slightly more aggressive/larger front bar would have helped balance the gnarly hood and wide fenders.
Thoughts?
The big limitation of the Raptor and the Ram Runner for ExPo use is the cargo capacity, which is around 1000 lbs. Could work for a crew of marathon runners who pack Powerbars for meals. It's too little for XL-size adventurers who want to take recovery gear and spare tires as well as camping equipment.
But like Scott says, who cares? It's a cool truck. I hope Dodge decides to sell the Ram Runner.
wonder how a flippac/fwc/atc would hold up over the jumps? :sombrero: