Both of those are full of crappy items and a waste of money.
Hey Banker, we have the T1i (can't remember if you knew that or not) and if I had the money and could do it over again, I would buy just the body, and then a couple of real nice lenses. We went with the kit lenses, because we just didn't have the money for anything more at the time. The setup works for us for now, and it's a great entry level DSLR setup, but as soon as I can spring for them, I'll be buying her some better ones. Kind of the whole "do it once, do it right" attitude that we use to build our jeeps, right? Btw, the video feature has been far more useful than I imagined. I don't even pack our video camera anymore.
Buy the body and one great lens. Get the lens used if you have to, but don't wast your money on a cheap lens. Add more great lenses as money and deals allow. Add a few accessories as you learn what your needs are.
The Nikon d5000 seems a lot more afordable than the d90 but where I am a beginner I feel like I dont really need the d90 but if it is something that I want to grow with it is doubtful that I will grow out of the d90 where something like the d5000 might be leaving me with something to be desired.
What do you guys think?
Bri, I'm pretty sure the D90 has a depth of field preview button. The D90 vs the D5000, adds a larger viewfinder, higher res LCD, built in motor drive for older AF lenses, two command dials, top mount LCD, dedicated buttons for white balance, ISO, shooting mode, metering mode, autofocus mode, and a few other things..One of the things I noticed in this price range: the Canon has a DoF (Depth of Field) preview, and the Nikons do not. IMHO this is one of the basic functions a camera should have.
If the Nikons had this function, I would say to get the camera that seems more intuative to use. If the camera is frustrating to use, dur to menus or lack of buttons for basic controls, you won't pick it up and make photographs.