kletzenklueffer
Adventurer
In comparing to very similar bikes, the KLR650 and DR650, while I hear the DR is a bit better off road and the KLR a bit better on road, much of the rest seems a toss up. Both have similar levels of aftermarket support and simplicity in the engine. The main difference I see is the air cooled DR vs the water cooled KLR. I read that the DR heats up when sitting still and the KLR has a vulnerable radiator.
If you had to choose for expedition, which would you choose? If climate is a factor, the bike would typically be used between 0 degrees F and 90 F in woodland riding with a balanced mix of temps. mostly forest riding, and it light to no traffic on the way.
I have heard that the DR is about worn out by 30K miles whereas the KLR keeps going far beyond this.
Anyone care to comment? Is more info needed?
If you had to choose for expedition, which would you choose? If climate is a factor, the bike would typically be used between 0 degrees F and 90 F in woodland riding with a balanced mix of temps. mostly forest riding, and it light to no traffic on the way.
I have heard that the DR is about worn out by 30K miles whereas the KLR keeps going far beyond this.
Anyone care to comment? Is more info needed?