ThundahBeagle
Well-known member
That’s exactly the challenge with trying to sell enough of the “mid sized” trucks to keep them in your market lineup (really, only the Maverick can truly be thought of as a ‘small’ anymore)…it basically seems to be a hearts over minds market.
The MS trucks may feel easier (and more fun) to drive and easier to park.
But price/mileage/capacity seem to clearly argue in favor of the FS 1/2 tons being the more rational choice.
Somewhere else on the forum I posted pics of dimensions of GMT-400 pickups vs the Colorado, and they are strikingly similar. The v6 Colorado does not get much better fuel economy than my 5.3 liter AFM/DFM Sierra.
Seems the only 4 cylinder Colorado I can get now is a turbo, and I can't get a stick shift.
IF, if Honda/Nissan produces a small, stripped down but capable 4x4 pickup with a 4 cylinder and maybe even a manual transmission, and priced it super inexpensive, they would fly off the shelves. But they would have to be inexpensive. Low $, solid little trucks. Like the size of the little Nissan trucks from the 80' and 90's. Simple. Big they are inexpensive enough. People would but them even without all the bells and whistles.