Winch efficiency: line speed, amperage, and heat factor

RoyJ

Adventurer
I was reading through a few winch threads lately, and saw much discussion on speed vs heat. Being a curious engineer, I did some digging on Warn's site and found some interesting info to share.

My theory is: with a DC motor, the closer you get to stall, the higher the amperage, the higher the heat, and lower the efficiency. This is due to lack of back EMF and lower speeds. So there must be some sweet spot between max line pull (lowest line speed) and max line speed (lowest line pull).

This study will focus on efficiency - achieving the best pulling power (force and speed) with the lowest amp draw on your electrical system. If you simply want all out pulling power, grab a Warn 16.5 and a snatch block!

1) I found with older winch designs, efficiency drops sharply with increased line pull. Let's look at the 8274:

8274.jpg

Look at the specs for 4000 and 8000 lbs, notice anything interesting? The line speed for 8000 is roughly half of 4000, implying similar work being done, but somehow it takes 200 amps more! It's 68% less efficient to pull at 8000 with this winch.

But what if we used a snatch block to achieve an 8000 lbs line pull? So now the winch sees half the load (4000 lbs) and therefore pulls at 16.4 ft/s using 286 amps. Cut the speed in half (due to snatch), and we have an effective 8000 lbs pull, at 8.2 ft/s, and use 200 amps less than doing it with the winch alone - almost like free power!


2) A larger winch pulling at lower line pull, is much more efficient than smaller winch at higher line pull. This is because a large winch uses lower gearing, and therefore spins the DC motor faster (more efficient).

Let's compare a Zeon 12 and 9.5xp, both doing an 8000 lbs pull:

Zeon 12
Zeon12.jpg

9.5xp
95xp.jpg

With the Zeon 12, we pull at 7.8 ft/s using only 321 amps
With the 9.5 XP, we pull at 7.4 ft/s using 413 amps

This is similar to my first example, except think of the gearing advantage of the Zeon 12 as an "internal snatch block".

Even though the Zeon 12 is very advanced, if we push it to its max, its efficiency suffers as well. Let's compare it to the 16.5ti, both at 12000 lbs line pull:

165Ti.jpg

The Zeon 12 pulls at 4.5 ft/s, using 446 amps
The 16.5ti pulls at 4.4 ft/s, using only 393 amps


What's interesting though, is the newer generation winches don't suffer nearly as much from efficiency drop at you approach max line pull, as the older gens. For instance, compare the 9.5 XP above, to the XD 9000:

xd9000.jpg

Like the venerable 8274, when you go from 4000 lbs to 8000 lbs, your amp jumps from 252 to 423, while doing almost the same work (line speed halves while pull doubles). Making the winch 68% less efficient, bang on with the 8274.

With the 9.5 XP, line speed drops from 11.8 to 7.4 ft/s, while amps climb from 248 to 413. If you do the math, it's only 33% less efficient. Wonder why? Perhaps better motor technology?


So what's the conclusion here? Well, for most of us that simply wants to extract ourselves once, it probably doesn't matter much, as long as you have enough line pull. But say if your battery is seriously undersized, or if you are doing lots of continuous pulls to extract others, then you want to use the least amount of power.

In this case, it's often advantageous to use a snatch block if you have an older winch. It's much more efficient to pull at 4000 lbs, using a snatch block, than strain your winch at 8000 lbs. Your pulling speed is nearly identical (not losing any time), but you amps are 68% lower.

If you have the newer generation winches, then the snatch block doesn't gain as much efficiency (only 33%). However, it's better to get a bigger winch, run it at lower line pull, to take advantage of the lower internal gear ratio (and spin the DC motor faster, with more back EMF).


Feel free to add to, and / or correct anything if you see any mistakes in my calculations. Hope that was useful to people trying to pick a winch, and like geeky calculations!
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
I'll address heat generation.

Heat produced by a motor can be calculated by various methods, either through voltage drop and current of the motor winding, or motor efficiency. Being a mechanical engineer, I like to look at the total system efficiency.

Let's look at the last example from above again, the XD 9000:

xd9000.jpg

To start, 1 horsepower is 550 ft-lbs / second, or 33000 ft-lbs/min. 1 hp is 746 watts. watts = volt x amp

At 4000 lbs, calculating power OUTPUT: 10.3 ft/min * 4000 lbs = 41200 ft-lbs/min or 1.25 hp
Power INPUT: 252A x 12V = 3024 watts = 4.05 hp
Efficiency = 1.25/4.05 = 31% (this sounds low, but keep in mind the friction of the planetary gears and cable)
Heat generated = (4.05-1.25) x 746 = 2089 watts

At 8000 lbs, power OUTPUT: 5.1 ft/min * 8000 lbs = 40800 ft-lbs/min or 1.236 hp
Power INPUT: 423A x 12V = 5076 watts = 6.80 hp
Efficiency = 1.236/6.8 = 18.2%
Heat generated = (6.8-1.236) x 746 = 4151 watts


Conclusion: by running the XD 9000 at 8000 lbs instead of 4000 lbs and a snatch block, you generate 2062 watts more heat into the motor and winch housing, and suck 2062 watts (172 amps) more power out of your battery and / or alternator, all the while achieving 0.14 hp LESS work!
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
After going through all the charts, I'll break down the data in classes of line pull to make it more useful.

If (BIG if) money was no subject, I find the following 3 winches, when combined with snatch blocks, will give the highest efficiency in terms of power + speed + amperage:

The 8274:

8274.jpg

Zeon 12 Platinum:

zeon12P.jpg

And 16.5ti:

165Ti.jpg

Here's how:

1) 2000 lbs

Use 8274 single line, 23.7 ft/s @ 182 amp


2) 4000 lbs

Use 8274 and snatch block (2000 lbs), for best power savings, 23.7/2 = 11.85 ft/s @ 182 amp

Use 8274 single line, for best speed, 16.4 ft/s @ 286 amp


3) 6000 lbs

Use Zeon 12P, for best power savings, 8.9 ft/s @ 261 amp

Use 8274 single line, for best speed, 12.0 ft/s @ 385 amp


4) 8000 lbs

Use 8274 and snatch block (4000 lbs), 16.4/2 = 8.2 ft/s @ 286 amp

This performs so well I can't recommend any other combination. Honorable mention is Zeon 12P, 7.8 ft/s @ 312 amp. Worst in every way.


5) 10000 lbs

Linear extrapolation shows 8274 can pull 5000 lbs: 14.2 ft/s @ 335 amp. Add a snatch block, 14.2/2 = 7.1 ft/s @ 335 amp.

Again, nothing else comes close. In comparison, Zeon 12P: 5.4 ft/s @ 381 amp; 16.5ti: 5.12 ft/s @ 342 amp


6) 12000 lbs

Best power: use 8274 and snatch block (6000 lbs), 12.0/2 = 6.0 ft/s @ 385 amp

Best efficiency: use Zeon 12P and snatch block (6000 lbs), 8.9/2 = 4.45 ft/s @ 261 amp


7) 16000 lbs

Best power: use 8274 and snatch block (8000 lbs), 8.7/2 = 4.35 ft/s @ 480 amp

Better efficiency: use Zeon 12P and snatch block (8000 lbs), 7.8/2 = 3.90 ft/s @ 321 amp

In comparison, 16.5ti at single line gets its behind kicked: 3.38 ft/s @ 494 amp!


8) 20000 lbs

Close tie: use 16.5ti and snatch block (10000 lbs), 5.12/2 = 2.56 ft/s @ 342 amp

use Zeon 12P and snatch block (10000 lbs), 5.4/2 = 2.70 ft/s @ 381 amp


See the pattern? There's not a SINGLE instance where a single line pull can beat a double line pull in efficiency AND speed.

In fact, here's the kicker, if we were to use unlimited snatch blocks, the 8274 would wipe the floor with all of them. For instance, at 20000 lbs, by using 3 snatch blocks (4 lines of pull):

8274 can pull 5000 lbs: 14.2 ft/s @ 335 amp. Divide by 4, 3.55 ft/s @ 335 amp @ 20,000 lbs line pull, beats both the 16.5ti and Zeon 12P!

Conclusion: use snatch blocks to increase motor speed on your winch as much as you can. It'll actually help you winch FASTER, while saving power. Unless you're pulling something really light (under 4000 lbs).

And, 8274 is the king, as long as you have snatch blocks :D
 

I Leak Oil

Expedition Leader
I think some of these need to include Time as a variable instead of a constant. How many amps are you using for a single line pull over time vs. a double line pull over time? The 8274 example appears like it will use fewer total amps with a single line pull at 8000lbs load for a given distance. It all really depends on how you want to slice it. Generally, newer designs are going to be more efficient in their mechanics and motors. Progress!
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
I think some of these need to include Time as a variable instead of a constant. How many amps are you using for a single line pull over time vs. a double line pull over time? The 8274 example appears like it will use fewer total amps with a single line pull at 8000lbs load for a given distance. It all really depends on how you want to slice it. Generally, newer designs are going to be more efficient in their mechanics and motors. Progress!

Good point you brought up, that's why I'm including line speed calculations, which include the time factor by nature.

In most weight settings, the snatch blocked 8274 is FASTER than single line counterparts. Let's compare itself for now, at 8000 lbs:

4000 lbs snatch block (8000 lbs effective): 8.2 ft/s, 286 amp

8000 lbs single line: 8.7 ft/s, 480 amp

To pull 50 feet at constant force, the snatch block setup takes 50'/8.2'/s = 6.10 sec * 286a = 1744 (amp-sec)

Single line: 50'/8.7'/s = 5.75 sec * 480a = 2759 (amp-sec)


So, with a single line, we only gain 0.35 seconds of time (5.7% faster), but use 36.8%, more energy!

The point is, many thinks you automatically halve your speed with a snatch block, but due to the way DC motors operate, this is far from the truth. In many cases (depends where you are on the motor curve), your speed barely drop, but drastically reduces your amperage.
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
Just realized I mis-quoted feet/min to feet/sec.

Doesn't change any of the concepts. In my example above the single line would save you 0.35 minutes, not seconds. The energy would also be amp-min instead of amp-sec (they're imaginary units anyway, done strictly for math purposes).
 

unseenone

Explorer
Interesting information. I have the XD9000, and use snatch block(s) as necessary. It definitely works better that way. You can also use at little winch line as possible, or spool out as much as possible. Very interesting. I suspect the ratings given, are with just one spool on the drum. Nice work.. I find that not being in a hurry is fine, so your winch lines don't get bunched up on the drum.

Good stuff, thank you for sharing.
 

Metcalf

Expedition Leader
You're generally never going to be pulling consistent high loads for long distances. If you are, you likely didn't prep the recovery correctly.

What happens when your pulling high loads for only a fraction of the time.....then the winch goes slack...and then you have to rely on the free load speed to pick up the winch cable before you drive over it?
One of the things that makes the 8274 so great is that is has a broad speed range. It is VERY fast under no load and still one of the fastest under load ( power use aside )

If your defaulting to double lining everything, you are also going to be much further down on the drum which decreases speed. I don't know how the published specs account for that.

With the recovery distance being cut in half by using a snatch block, you would also have to figure in the time to re-rig for an additional pull for the same overall distance. If you happen to be at a short anchor distance no loss, but if your 50-100 feet away that is a big loss. In my experience having a winch point at the perfect distance to re-rig every 50' or less for double line pull is rare.

One other downside to double lining is that now both lines are 'traveling', this adds abrasion to both lines since they will have to travel over/through whatever they happen to contact. This can be a very bad thing if you happen to be trying to winch over something like a rock ledge or the crown of a hill. If you can single line in these situations the winch cable is static in relation to the ground. This can be a big help when trying to winch over something that has a sharper edge.

In all my years of winching. I have NEVER had to use a snatch block to double line for self-recovery. The only time I can remember using one was to recover a MUCH heavier vehicle when using a smaller vehicle, which also had to be tied off. In the end I probably shouldn't have done it period. It is better practice to stay in your own weight class.

What I do commonly use a snatch block for is winch redirection. That happens a LOT. If you imagine having to do that AND double line pull at the same time you all of a sudden need an unrealistic amount of hardware.

I think it is important to look at the overall picture before getting set on one technique.....
 

RedF

Adventurer
Interesting information. I have the XD9000, and use snatch block(s) as necessary. It definitely works better that way. You can also use at little winch line as possible, or spool out as much as possible. Very interesting. I suspect the ratings given, are with just one spool on the drum. Nice work.. I find that not being in a hurry is fine, so your winch lines don't get bunched up on the drum.

Good stuff, thank you for sharing.

Refer to the manufactures specs for your winch. They specify pulling capacity by the layers of cable spooled on the drum, and specify that line speed/motor current are based of the first layer of cable.
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
You're generally never going to be pulling consistent high loads for long distances. If you are, you likely didn't prep the recovery correctly.

Mostly agree, except for winching or recovering uphill, from a ditch etc. This reinforces why I don't mind doubling up - the slight loss in speed, is not a big deal on a short pull.

What happens when your pulling high loads for only a fraction of the time.....then the winch goes slack...and then you have to rely on the free load speed to pick up the winch cable before you drive over it?

No different than if you had a slower winch (16ti) to begin with. Which is a must if you don't double up on a heavy truck.

One of the things that makes the 8274 so great is that is has a broad speed range. It is VERY fast under no load and still one of the fastest under load ( power use aside )

Precisely why it's pretty much the undisputed winner in my comparisons.

If your defaulting to double lining everything, you are also going to be much further down on the drum which decreases speed. I don't know how the published specs account for that.

All quoted speeds on based on 1st layer.

On the other hand, if you default to single line pull all the time, you're even further down on line pull (on 4th layer). So you're straining the motor even more and pulling even more amps than the quoted numbers.

With the recovery distance being cut in half by using a snatch block, you would also have to figure in the time to re-rig for an additional pull for the same overall distance. If you happen to be at a short anchor distance no loss, but if your 50-100 feet away that is a big loss. In my experience having a winch point at the perfect distance to re-rig every 50' or less for double line pull is rare.

Agreed. I never mean to imply to always double up. If you simply can't reach your anchor, and don't have additional tow rope, then obviously you have to stick with single line.

One other downside to double lining is that now both lines are 'traveling', this adds abrasion to both lines since they will have to travel over/through whatever they happen to contact. This can be a very bad thing if you happen to be trying to winch over something like a rock ledge or the crown of a hill. If you can single line in these situations the winch cable is static in relation to the ground. This can be a big help when trying to winch over something that has a sharper edge.

Good point, didn't think of this one. A valid example where a single line pull is more desirable.

In all my years of winching. I have NEVER had to use a snatch block to double line for self-recovery. The only time I can remember using one was to recover a MUCH heavier vehicle when using a smaller vehicle, which also had to be tied off. In the end I probably shouldn't have done it period. It is better practice to stay in your own weight class.

I imagine most people share the same view. I sure did, before I did this study.

Prior to this, I saw very little benefit to doubling up, unless you absolutely stall out. I also assumed single line is nearly twice as fast as double line.

But now, knowing the massive benefit of motor efficiency, I'm more inclined to use it more often, and simply wanted to share with others, who may either have smaller winches or less robust electrical systems.

What I do commonly use a snatch block for is winch redirection. That happens a LOT. If you imagine having to do that AND double line pull at the same time you all of a sudden need an unrealistic amount of hardware.

I think it is important to look at the overall picture before getting set on one technique.....

Again, didn't mean to imply a snatch block is the be all end all, it's simply a newly discovered method of conserving electrical power, lower residual heat, increase motor life, and achieving the same performance. Seems like a win-win to me when conditions allow.
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
As I look into more winches, I'm seeing a general pattern - the higher the difference in line speed between max line pull, and partial line pull, the more benefit this method becomes.

Following this pattern, I found one winch that would benefit massively, the Come Up Blazer:

http://www.comeupwinch.com/pro/detail.php?pid=304&cid=139&f=#.VtZb8_krJhE

I only recently heard about it from the ComeUp thread, and holy moly, it's like an OEM custom 8274 with dual 7.0hp motors.

Performance is as expected, mind blowing line speeds at lower line pull, but look at what happens when you approach 8000 lbs:

Blazer.jpg

939 amps at 8000 lbs! Not hard to see why, the motor is at a near stall, pulling only 2.3 ft/min.

Most people's electrical system won't handle this. You would need a 4/0 copper cable to not overheat, and probably two Grp 31 Odysseys to supply that without excessive voltage drop.

The winch seems to be the most efficient at 2000 lbs line pull. If we use a snatch block:

4000 lbs effective: 45.7/2 = 22.85 ft/min @ 395 amps

2 snatch blocks:

6000 lbs effective: 45.7/3 = 15.2 ft/min @ 395 amps
This is 2.5 times FASTER than a single line pull, at a bit over half the amps

4 snatch blocks:

8000 lbs effective: 45.7/4 = 11.42 ft/min @ 395 amps
This is 5 times faster than single line, and less than half the amps


Of course, as Metcalf mentioned, there are instances in real life where you can't rig up a snatch block, much less 3 of them. But it's cool to know just how tall-geared some of the fast winches are, and how much performance is lost at high line pull.

Here's an idea - what if the winch has a Prius like planetary gear CVT?

When near 8000 lbs, the CVT can drop the Blazer's 33.5:1 to 134:1? You're still single line, but the motor is now spinning 4 times faster, using only 395 amps, and your line speed jumps from 2.3 to 11.42 ft/min.

Win win?
 

toymaster

Explorer
I imagine most people share the same view. I sure did, before I did this study.

Nope, quit a few of us use a snatch block all the time. I have a 12K warn and a snatch block in my 2 door jeep 100% of the time for the reasons you have spelled out. The only time I use a single line is when I can't use a double due to required line length.



Again, didn't mean to imply a snatch block is the be all end all, it's simply a newly discovered method of conserving electrical power, lower residual heat, increase motor life, and achieving the same performance. Seems like a win-win to me when conditions allow.

I hope you mean "new" to you. Of course, electrical engineers are generally ahead of mechanical engineers anyway....:********: just a little humor there between disciplines.
 

RoyJ

Adventurer
Nope, quit a few of us use a snatch block all the time. I have a 12K warn and a snatch block in my 2 door jeep 100% of the time for the reasons you have spelled out. The only time I use a single line is when I can't use a double due to required line length.

I hope you mean "new" to you. Of course, electrical engineers are generally ahead of mechanical engineers anyway....:********: just a little humor there between disciplines.

Good to hear it being used! EEs know how to winch? :p

Perhaps it's just not talked about as often, I searched all over Pirate, Mud, JK/Wrangler forum, and couldn't find anything specifically.

Hence why I made the thread, to see what others have to share.
 

Metcalf

Expedition Leader
I would be interested to see how force most recoveries require in general.

Years back, I remember seeing an article on some averages from a load cell ( Bill Burke?). I think the number was something like 3000lbs (average) for most vehicle recovery situations. While I am not suggesting that everyone buy a small winch, it does make me wonder how much pull force you really use in a typical recovery situation. Generally we are not lifting the vehicle up off the ground, we are only assisting the vehicle or redirecting it.

Most of the times I have seen winches 'fail' to recover was because the recovery situation was not prepped correctly. The most typical issue being that the front tires, axle, or bumpers are wedged/locked behind a basically immovable object. I don't care how much winch you have, that won't work.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
187,897
Messages
2,899,700
Members
229,072
Latest member
fireofficer001
Top