Quick question. I have a two year old son. oh... and a wife. This summer, we'll ALL be going camping for the first time... together.
I have been camping since I was a kid. I dont think we EVER stayed in a "pay" campground. I want to take them camping starting this summer.
Here's the question-
Would you take the family to a established campground (Woods Canyon Lake in Arizona immediately comes to mind) or would you prefer to camp of the beaten path?
My mentality is that if something happens (I'm thinking trouble with other two legged creatures) you have the 'security' of other people in a campground. On the other hand, if something happens in the middle of nowhere... you're "up to bat" so to speak.
Not to say that I couldn't dispose accordingly in those situations.
I personally have no trouble going out in the back country if I'm alone or with friends. That way, we can get loud and a bit crazy, since there's no one around.
So... the supposed safety and security of a campground with other folks around, or the back country that could mean you're on your own?
Your feedback-
I have been camping since I was a kid. I dont think we EVER stayed in a "pay" campground. I want to take them camping starting this summer.
Here's the question-
Would you take the family to a established campground (Woods Canyon Lake in Arizona immediately comes to mind) or would you prefer to camp of the beaten path?
My mentality is that if something happens (I'm thinking trouble with other two legged creatures) you have the 'security' of other people in a campground. On the other hand, if something happens in the middle of nowhere... you're "up to bat" so to speak.
Not to say that I couldn't dispose accordingly in those situations.
I personally have no trouble going out in the back country if I'm alone or with friends. That way, we can get loud and a bit crazy, since there's no one around.
So... the supposed safety and security of a campground with other folks around, or the back country that could mean you're on your own?
Your feedback-