redraif
The uphill battle begins
So I'm sure some of you guys saw my thread about my engine noise that showed up after the shop left the timing tensioner pulley loose on the Sport.
http://www.expeditionportal.com/for...owing-issues-w-the-Sport-new-clattering-noise
Well he is trying to say the failure was simply a coincidence. That the hydralic portion failed not the pulley part. That his guy left the pulley part disconnected not the hydralic part, ergo the failure is not on him.
I dont know enough about how these parts interact with one another when properly versus improperly installed. Would the pulley part being left disconnected cause the failure?
I told him that to me, the coincidence is way too strong. The noise happened prior to the complete failure and was assumed to be the pulley rubbing on the timing cover. When it was left discnnect and wore a hole in the timing cover. Then the same noise returned intermittantly directly after the repair. Of which i told them about. I also told him I thought the tensioner needed to be replaced when he disovered the techs initial error. He said he thought it was fine. He chose to not repair it then.
In my opinion the labor should fall on him for not heading my advise to proactively change it wen the error was discovered.
What do you guys think? Would the pulley being left disconnected cause the hydralic part to fail?
It's a 2001 with the 3.0l.
http://www.expeditionportal.com/for...owing-issues-w-the-Sport-new-clattering-noise
Well he is trying to say the failure was simply a coincidence. That the hydralic portion failed not the pulley part. That his guy left the pulley part disconnected not the hydralic part, ergo the failure is not on him.
I dont know enough about how these parts interact with one another when properly versus improperly installed. Would the pulley part being left disconnected cause the failure?
I told him that to me, the coincidence is way too strong. The noise happened prior to the complete failure and was assumed to be the pulley rubbing on the timing cover. When it was left discnnect and wore a hole in the timing cover. Then the same noise returned intermittantly directly after the repair. Of which i told them about. I also told him I thought the tensioner needed to be replaced when he disovered the techs initial error. He said he thought it was fine. He chose to not repair it then.
In my opinion the labor should fall on him for not heading my advise to proactively change it wen the error was discovered.
What do you guys think? Would the pulley being left disconnected cause the hydralic part to fail?
It's a 2001 with the 3.0l.