IXNAYXJ
Adventurer
Get the MT/Rs, hands down a better tire. The Toyos are SUPER heavy and suck in the mud.I get the racer discount on Toyo stuff so that'll probably be my next set of tires.
-----Matt-----
Get the MT/Rs, hands down a better tire. The Toyos are SUPER heavy and suck in the mud.I get the racer discount on Toyo stuff so that'll probably be my next set of tires.
A DOT stamp is nothing more than an company stating they meet certain requirments. I have yet to see anything in writing stating they are not legal though.
If they weren't stamped as meeting DOT specs then they were not road use legal. There would be no way to prove that the bead locks were added after the stamping so long as the welds did not overlap the stamping, and the burden of proving that is on them - not on you.I used to have a yellow slip of paper that clearly said that the officer issuing and the judge agreed that no DOT stamp on the bead-lock was not legal for highway use. Now people have told me many times since then that the officer and the judge were wrong. They may in fact have been mistaken, but you know what? It simply cost WAY less to plead to a fix-it ticket and remove the wheels. They were way heavy anyway!
[drift]
If they weren't stamped as meeting DOT specs then they were not road use legal. There would be no way to prove that the bead locks were added after the stamping so long as the welds did not overlap the stamping, and the burden of proving that is on them - not on you.
The reason that I asked is because I see it stated frequently on the net that they are not legal, but no one can provide a section number or a link to the section that says that they are either directly or indirectly illegal for street use.[/drift]
In any case, if the OP isn't going rock crawling to the degree that he or she needs to be able to hammer a bent wheel lip back into shape then I would suggest going to a lighter wheel that still has an appropriate load rating. Knocking even a couple lbs. off the unsprung weight does marvelous things for ride quality and vehicle response.
I see BFG bashed all of the time, but I've also noticed that after the latest fad tire's luster has faded that the BFG's are still there, still getting the job done. Excepting my very first set of BFG's I've had excellent results in using them. I have one set of 285/75R16's that has been to hell and back. Their first trip anywhere was to RM 616 of the Baja 1000 in 2001 and the return route was through the San Ignacio Silt Beds AFTER the race. Life hasn't gotten much easier on them since, but they are now ready to be retired. I've no doubt that there might be a better tire for this or for that, but my experience with BFG's has been that they just keep plugging along doing it all without issue. Since I've no desire to be a "Tire of the Month" club member I keep buying what works for me.
Bead locks are not necessary ir you have these:
http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=3&products_id=36
Still moving I had to get out and clear the snow from the radiator.
![]()
Do you have any links to the laws that make them illegal? I've yet to see anything that specifically outlaws them, but it is always possible.
This has been an age old debate in Utah. Lets put it this way, there is one place in State law or policy that mentions beadlocks and that is in the state safety inspection manual handed out to all the safety inspection shops across the state. Its simple reads 'reject if beadlocks present'. But there is zero state law or motor vehicle code on the books that excludes them from being used. And as the safety manual is a literary work of the Utah Highway Patrol, they don't have the authority to create law based on an addition to their manual. So for most we consider them legal, just not wise to take them to the safety inspectionThat said it has not been tested in court, despite everyone's "buddy" getting a ticket for having them... nobody has actually ever produced a ticket for them. Mudflaps, tire widths, lift heights, bumpers, aftermarket lights, studded tires, etc... all covered both in the safety manual and law in Utah, but bead locks, no. Its definitely debateable as there are some catch-all 'safe vehicle' clauses that basically do offer the UHP some judgement calls on what is safe and what is not. But from an engineering standpoint the 36 bolts holding each of my tires on are about 6 times less likely to fall off than my 6 lugs
![]()