Yeah, that’s the kind of thing I’m talking about. Like many auto advancements, a lot of it comes out of the racing world.
I don’t know why it wouldn’t work on larger trucks. Wouldn’t even need to be nearly as sensitive.
I wonder if trophy trucks run them.
Ditto. Ours have been fantastic.
With shock technology coming along, I'm wondering when/if on-the-fly adjustable shocks will become a reality and whether it will be something that improves ride quality and varied terrain of expo sized vehicles.
Hunter RMV. Is that the company that took a garden variety camping trailer and plunked it on S&S chassis a while back? I thought they were summarily panned for that move? Or is it a diff company?
Saw that a while ago. The one thing that jumped out at me was the combo stairs thing.
one of the challenges we have with our stairs- which just fold up- are that they have a tendency to get muddy and their solution would solve for that. I like it.
Agree to at least having two heat sources and in our case the truck itself would be considered a third.
Curious as to what did you carry as a backup? I just have a little buddy propane heater since I carry few small bottles for use with our infrared bbq grill.
We didn’t have anything close...
Seems appropriate that at the top of the page there is a review of a stream-based water filter. https://expeditionportal.com/field-tested-guzzle-h2o-stream-water-filter/
Although we haven't needed it (yet) I built a larger-scale version of the one reviewed that uses a dual particle and UV...
I believe PnM was referring to certified seating - or otherwise suitable seating with restraints in the rear area. Not sure if that's even a thing, but it seemed like that was what he was proposing vs. kids running around in the back which sounds like a universally bad idea even though I can...
Thanks tacomabill. But isn't that coverage predicated on certain information provided at the point the policy is written? And there are exceptions to your statement made if that information is incorrect? For example, if someone says they are looking for coverage of a vehicle that weighs X...
Doesn't insurance get difficult if over GVWR also? I have a (bad) habit of reading the fine print on stuff and I seem to remember that our insurer could - AFTER AN ACCIDENT - deny coverage if the vehicle was deemed overweight.
I'm not a lawyer, but that's probably a fight I don't want...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.